(Quote)

BuyVM, Ramnode or if you really want the reliability, Linode has always been awesome.

(Quote)

Would you say your 8GB OpenVZ plans were comparable to Linode in terms of performance? Or should I stick with your KVM option that costs about double Linode's prices?

I currently use Linode but I'm tired of them getting hacked, lying and/or using gag orders to delay the reveal for 6+ months.

How about Linode or BuyVM? I think they might support some of those features

I can access Berry.pw, BuyVM, CatalystHost, HostMyBytes, Hostigation, KnownHost, Linode, Ramnode, SecureDragon, TragicServers, WiredTree (both billing & CP) just fine. It's only this one.

Tokyo, Japan Linode 7.95MB/s

It's still not as easy as Linode's load balancers but it's a cool implementation of Docker + API to build something like this on top of another provider.

(Quote)

So you'll have VMs say at Linode or Amazon and this load balancer will balance traffic to these external VMs.

Though it does sound more complicated than :inode's setup from an enduser's perspective. Wiht Linode, no Virtual Network setup is necessay: Just click to create balancer, and then select which nodes

I think linode's loadbalancers only work with nodes within linode's service. So it is ok if it is only within the same provider... though it would be great if this were not a limitation.

I am looking for LEB (or similar) providers who provides something equivalent to Linode's nodebalancers. That is to say, a load balancer as a service.

Tokyo, Japan Linode 2.25MB/s

(Quote)

Reliaibility? Terrible. The status page is more fake and delayed than Linode, i.e. end of the world = partial outage.

DC, US Softlayer 4.07MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 11.2MB/s Singapore Softlayer 9.12MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 2.58MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 87.9MB/s Dis

(Quote)

Tokyo, Japan Linode 1.14MB/s