Softlayer 21.5MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 8.31MB/sSingapore Softlayer 454KB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 78.0MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leasewe

Softlayer 1.65MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 1.38MB/sSingapore Softlayer 16.1MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 271KB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leasewe

Mine after been upgrade into 500Mbps uplink...

Tokyo, Japan Linode 13.9MB/s

DC, US Softlayer 9.04MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 13.2MB/s Singapore Softlayer 55.1MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 1.43MB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 8.81MB/s

(Quote)

I'll consider provider reliable or not after testing for few month and put some load. Some of reliable provider in list intovps, linode, leaseweb.

It has a good performance, even better than my Linode.

I want to use linode's tokyo data center but it's not sell to new account now ;<

Tokyo, Japan Linode 13.2MB/s

Ramnode, Digital Ocean, Buy Vm , Secure Dragon , Linode, Vultr ?

> Tokyo, Japan Linode 14.2MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 14.2MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 5.44MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 4.98MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 13.2MB/s

rockethost.com is down. That was their unmanaged brand. Maybe they had a hard time differentiating themselves in the market, since an unmanaged KH node is really no different than a Linode or such.

You could try the Linode London location, just remember to switch your preference from XEN to KVM before spinning up your first machine.

DC, US Softlayer 14.1MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 6.36MB/sSingapore Softlayer 10.8MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 47.5MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 48.5MB/sDisk Sp

Softlayer 4.02MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 2.14MB/sSingapore Softlayer 3.30MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 20.6MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leasew