(Quote)

(Quote)

@joepie91, what about the likes of Monero with its adaptive block size? Seems to be the primary concern you have with Bitcoin.

I'd say that there are no truly good solutions yet. Bitcoin is probably the closest to a sensible approach, but has its own share of problems, in particular the ever-growing nature of the transaction

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Perhaps you'd like to explain what the technical properties are of IOTA that make it a better option for a trustless decentralized payment network than Bitcoin, then? In particular, you'll probably wa

If all Bitcoin transactions turned into Ethereum transactions overnight, you'd be paying the same (or more) for your Ethereum transactions as you're doing now for your Bitcoin transactions. The econom

Crypto currencies but buying them might not be that conveniant depending on where the costumer is located. There are countries where you can buy bitcoins at gas stations though so that probably widely

Wait, so it would pay off now to have more miners? But how come it doesn't? I don't get it, is something flawed here in the bitcoin scaling, or designed on purpose that way?

@joepie91 - You need to remember that just because there was 12,000 pending transactions, the fees still aren't as high as Bitcoin at that level. That's what the main issue is, sure, sometimes any coi

Ethereum's scalability is hilariously poor. See also this. Most every serious proposal so far for 'improving' Ethereum scalability has involved not doing anything on the Ethereum blockchain at all, bu

(Quote)

Yes, the bitcoin network isn't in a good condition, it's a pity. Please look at the bitcoin fees for transactions page. I see 11-20 Sat/byte miners fee matches 40-1080 min confirmation delay, 1-10 Sat

I guess that would vary from a tax office to a tax office. Better be safe than sorry. So far we were unable to secure a binding interpretation for accounting in Bitcoin.