Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 17,3MB/s

has cool features MORE than standard installs. Linode, DigitalOcean, Vultr, etc. etc. However, at the end of the day, if you're trying to sell a client on "custom-built ______" but

Tokyo, Japan Linode 9.23MB/s

Softlayer 5.69MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 8.10MB/sSingapore Softlayer 4.11MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 7.47MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leasew

Seriously, by your logic, no one should ever use Amazon, or Linode, or Digital Ocean, or Vultr...only small, obscure hosts with previous virgin IPs that have been carefully sheltered from but are now

Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 5.07MB/s

Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 1.98MB/s

OVH, Roubaix, FR: 61.0MB/sDownload speed from Linode, Frankfurt, DE: 16.5MB/sDownload speed from Redstation, London, UK: 89.3MB/sDownload speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.33MB/sDownload speed from Lea

if there are viable client pages running in production on a server I think one should at least be able to spin up an instance at DO, vultr, linode, whatever to get things up an running while waiting f

Tokyo, Japan Linode 5.93MB/s

OVH, Roubaix, FR: 9.70MB/s Download speed from Linode, Frankfurt, DE: 13.5MB/s Download speed from Redstation, London, UK: 22.4MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.54MB/s Download speed from

(Quote)

True but I don't think it's fair to make the site compete against DO/Linode pay outs given that both of them are heavily VC/Bank funded at this point.

Tokyo, Japan Linode 8.43MB/s

I have not used Xen enough to make any substantial claims but I felt my KVM VMs performing better as compared to when they were running Xen on same hardware. Linode also claimed that 3x performance bo

Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 10.9MB/s

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)