Tokyo, Japan Linode 10.1MB/s

Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 8.41MB/s

Currently there is Linode/DO (too big, too expensive) like offering, or puny NAT ovz. nothing in between.

Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 10.3MB/s

(Quote)

(Quote)

I understand your point. And it makes sense on one side, on the other the "just like any other provider" point is not correct though. Look at DO, Vultr, Linode, AWS, Google Cloud, et

(Quote)

(Quote)

The templates in the beta folder include support for KVM/Qemu based virtual machines, including Digital Ocean, Vultr, Linode, etc.

DC, US Softlayer 7.20MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 2.52MB/s Singapore Softlayer 2.57MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 5.95MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 9.29MB/s Dis

Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 8.93MB/s

i think so, doesn't seem any sign of softlayer left in there

Linode offers private IP (traffic is free within this network, but works only within 1 datacenter). Linode is not really a low end provider, but I think it is cheaper than having to go to an IBM/Amazo

(Quote)

After this message:

Haven't seen Linode suspend for CPU load yet, they just send you notifications if the CPU load is high for a longer time, but they explicitly state that it's just a notification and no warning to lowe

Isn't the $10 linode capped to something like 125mbit network-out?

You might get away with it to some degree more at linode, for now, but I promise you, linode pay more than $10 p/gbit dedicated so they cant sell it + a VPS cheaper.

You get it with Linode for 10$ though, at least for download.