(Quote)

recommend OVH & ArubaCloud as solid alternatives to Vultr/DigitalOcean/Linode

Vultr respond in 56ms and Linode in 112s

I have services with Linode, Dediserve, Iwstack and Scaleway and have used Digial Ocean , Lunanode and vultr. I didn't had any issues.. all are nice.

Also Linode provide a way to scale up and down, as well as migrate disk between datacenter, and is extremely easy.

But back on topic..... if I had to choose one it would be Vultr based on my past experiences between DO and Vultr. Never tried Linode.

Here are some real differences between DO, Vultr, Linode:

Never tried Linode. DO is rather slow nowadays for the price. Both Vultr and DO have excellent network and availability.

(Quote)

3 x XBox One Games ( BF1 , JC3 , Tom Clancy ) , Cloud from ( DO , Linode , Vultr , Bluehost , GoDaddy , BlueHost ) , Dedi from (LSW)

some of my Centmin Mod users came across UpCloud similar to Linode with faster processors E5-2687Wv3 3.1Ghz or E5-2680v2 2.8Ghz depending on location https://community.centminmod.com/threads/upcloud-f

It looks like Vultr/DO/Linode all follow somewhat similar features and pricing, and all are pretty stable and professional. Are their any other companies you would add to this list that has similar p

(Quote)

Benchmarked then all and Linode wins especially now that majority of Vultr VPS are the lower clocked 2.4Ghz and not the 3.4+ Ghz ones so closer to the lower DO cpu performance.

(Quote)

@jarland Random thoughts - I've always felt DO should run their own DNS recursion platform for their infrastructure to rely on. Linode do it, Vultr do it, I hate having to rely on Google.

I love Linode, stable and much features (Image)

Softlayer 3.20MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 6.78MB/sSingapore Softlayer 4.95MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 19.5MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leasew

I stayed with Linode for some years chiefly because their support is usually nice. You can max out the CPU usage without being chased by sysadmins. DO and vultr are also pretty stable, but I would not

2) Linode