I believe cPanel still has a lot of traction even for small hosting companies, I provide 3 options for shared hosting plans - cPanel, DirectAdmin & Enhance. Out of the 3 cPanel has beaten Dire

As a user, I feel that there is not much difference between DirectAdmin and cpanel. Can someone tell me what are the advantages of cpanel compared to DirectAdmin?

This can be done with ISPConfig, where you can choose between 'normal' and jailed SSH access, and allow password login or restrict it to key-based authentication.

Personally, I think there are many panels that offer the same things as cPanel, and they're even part of the same group (webpros)

I don't like cPanel; I prefer to use DirectAdmin. I feel cPanel is overrated.

I think cpanel sucks and I don’t use hosts that have it.

In terms of web hosting panels, cPanel is still the boss. People choose shared web hosting over VPS only because they want something quick and easy to set up. DA fails hard in this regard, as appare

I am considering taking a look at webuzo panel from softaculous (as we like the idea of softaculous either way), rather not having to pay the blood money to cPanel if possible, but if that is the best

Based on my own experience the common public still prefers cPanel. Our cPanel plans costs a good bit more than the DirectAdmin plans yet from traffic outside LET most clients signup for cPanel. Direct

(Quote)

cPanel? DirectAdmin?

cPanel is obviously the industry standard, but with the per-account pricing model and frequent price increases, it’s becoming harder to justify. Especially as a smaller, independent provider that’s tr

(Quote)

(Quote)

Heh? Why you need a cpanel then? Just make it a pure FTP server with users having their own space. This cyber panel is just a waste.

PHP is disallowed on FTP accounts. Read my comments please. Anything outside public_html is considered private to the account, they are not in public domain if they are not available on the public i

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)