I prefer DoT and, if I need to, would use dns.sb which is a privacy-friendly provider. However that, and DNSCrypt, send the queries to a third party anyway. If the resolver is run on the same node tha

That could be a way but tor exit relays generate a lot of dns requests which can cause issues for the dns server if it's unable to handle the load/traffic and of course less centralization. I would pr

Shameless plug: There are dnscry.pt relays available in Amsterdam, Liberty Lake and Allentown which don't support plain DNS but DNSCrypt, DoT and DoH, if that helps.

etc) URLs. I couldn't be bothered to setup DNS without filtering for Tor only.

@MannDude Is there any chance you could run a recursive DNS resolver on your host nodes and have it listen on the gateway so VPSes can use it? That would allow Tor exit operators to significantly impr

My VPS is now showing a new IPv4 address in an entirely different netblock, it is up and can be reached there. I've updated relevant DNS records and I've edited my hosts file in the interim.

(which is mainly just used at the moment for DNS / VPN development stuff) and those issues all went away. Currently just using Vultr for BGP, but since I'm using a clean IP space I'm not getting all

There was apparently a leak of all whitelisted TCP & DNS IPs but can't certainly tell you if it's real or not. If it is, quite hard to find a provider with a whitelisted IP since they literall

- rDNS & DNS.

(Quote)

IPInfo ( @Operable4829 ) has some nice summary for IP ranges so you can look up the ASNs, BGP prefixes, countries and even reverse dns entries in given range:

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

That's a cool idea. we have 7 locations right now so the infrastructure could support it down the road. Would you use it primarily for DNS, load balancing, or something else?