(Quote)

(Quote)

@VPSSLIM

(Quote)

did @VPSSLIM already react? maybe via dm or in other clandestine ways?!

And in last post VPSSLIM didnt deny what i was saying.

Would appreciate your attention on this, @VPSSLIM.

I asked @VPSSLIM to clarify this issue back on 16 October ( https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4040937/#Comment_4040937 ) and then again on 27 November ( https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comme

if that's the case, then vpsslim is the problem. the good thing is that this topic is now being discussed!

(Quote)

https://www.paddle.com/blog/what-is-merchant-of-record pretty clearly explains how it should work: customer buys from Paddle (they add VAT as appropriate), Paddle buys from VPSSLIM (no VAT)

(Quote)

i already understood you. i just wanted to emphasize once again how this went down and, as i understand vpsslim, how it continues to go down, because he does not make a clear statement about the doubl

(Quote)

(Quote)

Of course, I was addressing @VPSSLIM , not you (Image)

i'm saying that in this particular case, whoever vpsslim or paddle was charging the vat again. the question is, who is responsible for charging the vat? is it vpsslim or its payment service provider p

(Quote)

in the beginning you were referred back and forth from paddle to vpsslim then back to paddle. lots of emails. very annoying and customer unfriendly from paddle. but initially the problem for me was wi

(Quote)