Just for fun I looked up the compiled result sets of my recent storage VPS benchmarks plus a single run on my @c1vhosting storage VPS, which was so crappy that I couldn't even reasonably do 10+ runs.

Thanks for this very thorough review. One very important addition is that all those providers are in business for less than three to four years except for liteserver (and they are not Mediterraneans f

(Quote)

(Quote)

With Liteserver my experience was very positive. Yes, the VPS was expensive, but as much as I'm willing to have a look at a super-cheap and possibly new provider, with my primary backup and storage se

Liteserver

Liteserver

* @LiteServer (liked it a lot and still do. it served and still serves me well and reliably)

They easily match or even outperform my liteserver storage box (except host_c's connectivity seems to be somewhat lower, but still more than good enough).

Seriously though, I'm just amazed by my host_c storage VPS, in fact so much so that I'm very likely to not renew my liteserver backup VPS which I like(d) a lot but the @host_c VPS (a) has multiple tim

Check @LiteServer reseller plans

(Quote)

(Quote)

LiteServer unlimited reseller hosting for €100,80 recurring was the best offer I got (Image)

Shock Hosting, Krystal Hosting, Liteserver are fancy shit asf.

* Liteserver (NL)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)