Of course there's implied performance, and 200 MB/s on a shared system with the IOPS that NVMe provides is significantly better than what you'd get with spinning rust. Is it slower than most cheap VPS

(Quote)

p.s. it was online.net, today scaleway, and I had several cheap Atoms from them, but long time ago...

(Quote)

* Budget: As cheap as possible (lower than node servers)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

got a DL380 G9 as well, might ask @VeloxMedia for colo (Image)

So you only buying the extremely cheap stuff from dodgy providers? Lols....

You're only going to see it either from established providers or scammers though, it's not worth it unless you're operating at scale with ultra cheap transit/power/colocation or can afford to lose on

it out but the remaining ones are the $7 and cheap, not worth the time).

I can recommend heymman servers, they are really cheap and offers a good quality for dedis:) Or maybe ovh eco line?

what makes it rare to start with? (for vps), why is it so cheap? I might go buy a @DediRock $7/yr vps later.

TierHive - (Alpha) Cheapest Hourly VPS Starting at $0.000135/hr ($0.10 per month)| FREE TO TRY | 1TB storage VPS from $2.65 /month equivalent (Credit-based and billed hourly)

Pricing is at market. Discounts possible for colo/dedicated clients. Please DM or open a ticket to discuss further.

Yeah, I can kind of understand there not being much demand. Taipei is only 50ms from my (newly acquired) servers in Seoul and Tokyo. Bandwidth isn't cheap in either, but it seems significantly cheaper

when we use services from cheap providers, by default we also have to accept the idea of “you get what you pay for.” As long as it is good within its price range, that’s fine. We can’t demand performa