What is MXRoute's primary?

That's acceptable. Fyi mailchannels's mailbaby's fallback and mailbaby's mxroute's fallback.

Clearly, @jar tried to help the OP, then came @tsoft, who is unwilling to communicate effectively through MXRoute's official support channels. LET isn't one of those.

(Quote)

that the only intention of the tsoft is to bash Mxroute and Jar and put them into a bad light on a public forum.

(Quote)

and there is this fucking "proof" that mxroute is bad... screenshot from trustpilot about a lack of fucking refund on BF/CM promotional plans. Total annihilation, ultimate destroy, j

(Quote)

Mxroute gives you plenty of warnings regarding their antispam policy, at every step of signup procedure, in their ToS and in their help documentation. I'm sorry to say but I don't think this is the ri

No no don’t you get it? There are only two parties involved in a transaction when an email is sent to an MXroute customer. If the MXroute customer doesn’t receive it, the two parties are defined like

(Quote)

(Quote)

Wait, so you think MXRoute is resposible for other people having mis-configured their mail servers? Get real. That's a them problem. Go complain to them.

mxroute - custom filter that create problems

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

If you're saying that mxroute rejects email without a valid from: header, then that's correct - it's a required field according to the RFC, and should be rejected.

(Quote)