(Quote)

(Quote)

Contabo CPU not so consistence, for my VPS, I always have the CPU steal between 0.1 to 0.3. Disk IO is limited but it is still better than ssd. Network connection still not as good as OVH if you are c

(Quote)

(Quote)

contabo should be fine for your use case

Now if I use VPS L from Contabo for Asia region (30$/m), I will have 30GB of RAM and 200GB of NVMe which is a big win for me.

contabo

Of course you are right. I don't wait a support for the NAT box or Contabo (that is really not for production and their price is the lowest).

contabo VPS M > wishosting (32gb ram KVM amsterdan) > ax 61 hetzner

, as I can only imagine what support i will get in the case of emergency from nexusbytes (NB. I didn't wait longer than 1-2 hours for reply from linode|vultr|contabo etc. support ever)

1. The disk I/O are excellent ... better than any VPS I had so far (including Contabo VPS with NVMe disk).

contabo but it is in germany, same with prepaid-hoster

I didn't know contabo had services in US.

I'm trying Contabo VPS M NVMe which ends up costing €11.49/month (€8.99 + €2.50 extra for their Seattle DC). It's working well and has a very very fast AMD EPYC processor, but I'm interested in other

Yep, netcup sells nice VMs, I still have and very much like my VDS with them which was and is much cheaper than e.g. Contabo VDSs and about in the same ballpark in terms of performance.

oh and to add not contabo

Don't get me started about how shit contabo is. Ordered a VPS in singapore for the first hour everything was normal ssd, bandwidth speed etc. After an hour speed was 200kbps from fast.com phoned and m

(Quote)

One of the major issues with testing the host cache & presenting it as disk read is that - as was the case with the contabo benchmark - a run on an empty node will have full use of the hosts m