nah, it's still just decent. I've got 6 or 8 VPS from LET providers and frankly the only thing slower than the RackNerd disk is the MassiveGrid disk lol.

And btw, NO, disk is not "decent", it's amazingly great for a cheap BF VPS.

(Quote)

I had couple small downtimes now so I thought my VPS is being moved. But the performance shows the same old disk like before:

I agree, disk is decent but on mine at least the CPU benchmark is pretty poor and no ipv6 in Ashburn. I picked something else up during the black friday sale and I'll be retiring my racknerd vps.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

: 925.1 MiBSwap : 1024.0 MiBDisk : 24.5 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)Kernel : 6.1.0-28-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6 Network Inform

(Quote)

(Quote)

TL;DR: A great choice if your focus is on disk-heavy loads like DBs and, provided you buy a VPS with at least two vCores, even worthy of a recommendation - with a caveat though; your use case should n

Yay, me happily purring! Yes, it's "only" an E5v4 and certainly not a speed demon. But for a cheap VPS for less than $30/yr I'm pleased, usually E5v4 based (cheap) VPS I benchmark ar

Any server can have a 2nd disk with 1-10 TB diskspace

(Quote)

(Quote)

How much upload speed? our fiber operator provides equal download and upload speeds. Thats one good thing for me.

> iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

(Quote)