But this Sunday evening the liteserver test file download speed (via ipv4) was still incredibly slow (30000 Bytes/sec) and it wasn't a problem of your test server (download from a different VPS almost

(Quote)

EnabledRAM : 977.3 MiBSwap : 0.0 KiBDisk : 993.0 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)Kernel : 6.1.0-18-cloud-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ OfflineIPv

(Quote)

PostgreSQL is disk-heavy, especially when handling large queries. If you're on a slower disk (like an HDD), that could affect performance, but this isn't as much of an issue if you're using an SSD.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Port Speed 300 MBPS

(Quote)

I'm not picking on anything, I said it was decent. But in my result set of different LET VPS, the Racknerd disk is the second slowest, and it's in the bottom 20% for sure.

Well, RAM and disk space is dedicated to you, so you can use those as much as you want. Disk I/O is limited to 1GB/s to minimize the possibility of some clients affecting the disk I/O of others.

But yabs does that (in brackets ()) next to the speed, which can be verified by multiplying block size * IOPS

Based on the result sets I have, and that's quite a lot, your statement "frankly the only thing slower than the RackNerd disk is the MassiveGrid disk lol." is simply, pardon me, nons

(Quote)

(Quote)

nah, it's still just decent. I've got 6 or 8 VPS from LET providers and frankly the only thing slower than the RackNerd disk is the MassiveGrid disk lol.