(Quote)

It seems to be on pre-order now, likely because of covid. You were able to order them a while back. Also it isn't the usual fair share or 100 Mbps guaranteed bandwidth kinda thing you get with colocat

(Quote)

If you need way more storage than that, I actually suspect it might not be that worth it, because traffic costs are usually expensive with colocation. If you need something like 10x16 TB, unless its a

(Quote)

It's cheap.

You can colo an atom box with 4x 16tb drives(or more) for $75/month. Where can you get that kind of storage as a dedi?

1 Server in colocation in general makes very little sense cost wise vs a Dedicated Server agreed, colocation will almost definitely get cheaper on a "per server" basis the more space

Colo has its place and definitely when your looking for high capacity.

Colo has its place and definitely when your looking for high capacity.

(Quote)

By the way, if you're thinking about going with a single server colo, vs. a dedicated server please read: https://blog.racknerd.com/dedicated-servers-vs-colocation-which-one-is-right-for-you/

(Quote)

It's all a game at the end of the day. Colo, is quite simple. You're going to pay for power, bandwidth and IPs if needed upfront. Providers are interested in terms, commitments, and perhaps ramps depe

(Quote)

(Quote)

But what if you colo a 4U blade chassis with 12 blades and you sell VPS to 1000 people.

As someone who does colo. It really depends on the hardware it self.

It depends on what specs you are colocating. If you colo a server with 12 x 16 TB for €60/mo now try to do the same dedicated.

It should be obvious that they charge more for colo.