(Quote)

Not a fan of centralisation of cloudflare, but they're probably the only provider that could handle that magnitude of ddos, for free on top. Akamai, google, amazon probably could too but then gotta pr

What you have to realize is that the average client getting attacked is slim-to-none. This is a single client that was receiving more than average DDoS attacks as they were reselling services to high-

(Quote)

I know @serverpoint has path.net ddos protection and they also have servers in Dallas, Texas.

With good DDoS protection, preferably path.net

Datapacket is also the owner of cdn77. It is believed that they are using the same network to sell excess capacity in the form of dedicated servers. CDNs are often the target of ddos attacks and a cdn

time ago that it no longer wanted to play in the DDoS game, which I can understand from various points of view.

AFAIK our IP transit allows for nulling DDOS at their end so that should not be too much of a problem on our port. I started GSP when I was 15 and did alright at it for a few years. Right at the start

I also used to be a GSP, albeit I was pretty picky with my customers. The DDoS issues are not as much as a concern to me, but they do definitely attract that and having to throw money on mitigation do

I used to do game server hosting. What is wrong with it these days other than all the DDOS because someone wasn't made an admin in MineCraft?

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

To be fair, I don't see it clearly advertised where they specify how much of their network is dedicated to DDoS mitigation! 270 Tbps capacity would lead you to believe it's pretty high, but maybe they

(Quote)

(Quote)

I doubt that it is a technical restriction. Instead, I think that it is a signal to not resell their network for DDoS protection services.

(Quote)

(Quote)