Many old server deals are just cheap but price per performance makes it really a bad deal.

I have quite a few cheaper. $5/y 1C2G35G20T, $5.4/y 1C512M30G, $6/y 1C4G20G1T, €6/y 1C2G20G40T, €8.6 2C4G50G3.5T. All of these are >1-2 years and most not tiny. But it's not really a pissing co

I have at least one VPS that's even cheaper (< $10/yr) but it's really tiny. Besides, I'm not against super-cheap deals per se. I do understand and am not at all against it, that throwing out s

But servers still need hostnames for sending/receiving. Some white-labeling can be done via CNAMEs as well but we'll use non-branded general domains in some areas.

(Quote)

(Quote)

Yes, I'm sure that every single one of these ultra cheap deals is sold at a loss except for maybe RackNerd, but they also drive other sales to the business, and are usually done responsibly to fill up

I'm not so sure about that. We've already got domains for the mail service.

I got turned onto the .ps ccTLD reading some comments about https://x.com/receipts_lol deplatforming incident with Namecheap (Who eventually reverted their decision). Someone suggested a .ps for them.

(Quote)

Make sure you check their aftermarket servers, they can be really cheap, like $10/y or lower for 1/1/5 and 1TB traffic.

(Quote)

like to add some more to our offering since domains continue to be a big part of our business nowadays.

(Quote)

(Quote)

Does it have to be Malaysia? We have EPYC's in our Ohio DC for cheap!

* the vps is very cheap. I dont expect support at all tbh, dont even expect 95% uptime. but it is always nice to have some notification outages. also sharing experience.

That’s a valid point. Aepto isn’t designed primarily for large-scale domain investors managing thousands of parked domains. It’s built for teams and businesses where domains are tied to live websites,

(Quote)

(Quote)