(Quote)

(Quote)

Nope, in my experience, HVH is much more ok than others. BlueVM is s**t, ChicagoVPS is a bit better than BlueVM, and HVH is much better than CVPS. I think I can rate HVH as an average provider.

(Quote)

Search for colocrossing and chicagovps and bluevm reviews, same parent company.

GreenWebHost, VortexNode, ChicagoVPS..

in particular, the persona of that guy Chris at ChicagoVPS.

I would distinguish CC-owned providers (e.g., ChicagoVPS) from CC-resellers (e.g., the topic of this thread: HiFormance). It's especially the latter that are risky, especially if they've appeared only

ChicagoVPS 1

chicagovps

It's been interesting. From the strong-arm takeover of HVH due to expensive LTO contracts, to Biloh and the bros over at ChicagoVPS - well done on the hardcore IP hoarding

Source HB thread: https://hostballs.com/t/colocrossing-chicagovps-hudsonvalleyhost-lowendbox-lowendtalk-sold-to-deluxe-com/815

I have a game master server which runs on Crystal (utilizes only 1 core). It will be used only as a match making server. And I did some testing on ChicagoVPS last month, and my results were:

No idea about OP's second provider. ChicagoVPS has in fact been in some distasteful controversy about its industry shenanigans, but they do deliver an end-user product that for the most part works, m

(Quote)

So, if you have seen my recent posts in the cest pit, I was having some trouble with chicagovps. The server was literally offline after it was "successfully provisioned". And so I co

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

InterNAP provides some of the best network blend for gaming. NFOservers is a good gaming-based host, but is on the expensive side. Good budget options are: Vultr/Choopa in NYC, ChicagoVPS in Chicago,