Virtualizor - Start, stop, re-install your VPS

Proxmox configuration is equally straightforward, but with slightly different parameters (e.g. mbps_wr). That's how most hosts will be configuring it, anyway. Real-life example (VPS in Brazil from Jus

what you pay for. In europe, their lowest tier VPS plans are just 1-2 euro per month with 10GB or 80GB of storage. At that price, most of it is going towards the IPv4 in my opinion, let alone if you

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Whether the VPS costs $7, $15, or $50, it does not change the flow of the technical argument.

The $7/year is a common expression on this forum symbolizing a very lowend, cheap vps, it is not meant to be taken literally.

You should buy a dedicated server not the VPS.

(Quote)

The vast majority of users knows that if you buy a $7/year vps from a lowend provider, you will not be able to constantly sustain 1-2 Gbps disk speed. If it delivers bursts of that it's great, but nob

Ah cool. Currently I only have 1 VPS in any location, but was planning to add a storage node to one were I currently have compute. I only ever use storage for daily backups, so seems a shame to &q

I paid my invoice but my vps is pending.

Probably best to keep the provider specific question in his other thread: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/213580/ionos-admits-to-capping-nvme-vps-to-200mb-s-hdd-speeds-via-software-limits/p1

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

If a VPS is sold as “NVMe performance” but sustained throughput is capped to HDD/SATA levels by policy, that’s not competitive secrecy — that’s a mismatch between marketing and delivered capability.

* Technical data confuse buyers. They don't buy honor, they buy VPS.

If a provider markets NVMe performance and then enforces a hidden software cap that drops sustained throughput into HDD/SATA territory, that’s a transparency problem — regardless of whether the VPS co