(Quote)

: 1.9 GiBSwap : 512.0 MiBDisk : 39.3 GiBDistro : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTSKernel : 6.8.0-36-genericVM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ OfflineIPv4 Network Information:------

* DISK : min 512GB m2 + 140tb hdd raid 6 or 10

Disk : 29.4 GiB

(Quote)

1.0 Gbps port speed

1.0 Gbps port speed

I did not “mock” your YABS result. Almost everyone agrees, in this thread, that disk i/o performance is non-issue. Do you think everyone is “mocking” your YABS disk I/O result?

(Quote)

With that disk I/O, what use case not working in your case? May be I am missing something here.

(Quote)

* Based on YABS disk i/o , I don’t see any performance issue here, and HH can’t throw you a “bone” for non-issue

Can confirm they havent changed the 1G upload that some KS servers got, Even when pushing 100TB+

✔ EnabledRAM : 3.8 GiBSwap : 0.0 KiBDisk : 45.5 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)Kernel : 6.1.0-28-cloud-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

: 1.9 GiBSwap : 1024.0 MiBDisk : 49.9 GiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)Kernel : 6.1.0-28-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ OfflineIPv4 Network Informa

(Quote)

✔ EnabledRAM : 3.8 GiBSwap : 0.0 KiBDisk : 9.7 TiBDistro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)Kernel : 5.10.0-33-cloud-amd64VM Type : KVMIPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ OnlineIPv6