(Quote)

(Quote)

WHMCS is a company with several employees, offices and all the associated costs. Especially for a UK based firm.

For those who asked about the existing owned license, this is what I got from them:

WHMCS is getting greedy: a fair solution would have been in example this:

Hosts around here would have a lot more reason to complain about SolusVM licensing going that way. You only need one WHMCS, no matter how many servers you have. SolusVM, however, that's a direct per-n

"Developing, improving and providing support for the WHMCS product has ongoing costs, and therefore a subscription based model makes more sense."

(Quote)

I don't like it, but I don't really care. I've always used WHMCS.

The price change basically affects no one who would be sensitive to WHMCS price changes. If you have over 1000 active clients, a $10 license fee change won't even register on the radar.

Betting this was the 'security issue' they patched with the license module a month or so ago.

Your link redirects to /members/cart.php with owned licenses marked as "Out of stock". You thought WHMCS would let people slip through that easily?

I doubt they do any call homes, that'd be iffy at best. The license gets cached locally and it likely just carries a variable of how many clients are allowed. WHMCS then refers to this data on every (

So, decode the checking file, have it return dummy data to WHMCS like only 5 active clients, and have infinite clients

(Quote)

They have also confirmed that suspended users for none payment are counted towards 'active' users and that the data they collect from your WHMCS install is not looking at the Status= Active when deter

Just got me an owned license while I still could. Because Why not.

OnApp has their in to do similar shit. Now that WHMCS has done it they could very well announce something similar this week and WHMCS already took the heat.

If someone still needs owned license use my aff please: https://www.whmcs.com/members/cart.php?a=confproduct&i=1?aff=22454

(Quote)