No one likes a price increase and although I understand why people are complaining, it really has little to do with WHMCS being greedy or not.

A provider on a budget under $40 is not a provider. It's like a kid playing house. Why is WHMCS responsible for your backups?

I think if you can't accept the annual contract, even though it's a bug, you'd better cancel the pending services and make refund, should not just unilaterally modify the contract to monthly in whmcs

I wish this were true, but in all of these years there's been no suitable replacement for all of the features WHMCS has to offer. We even tried switching to Blesta a while back (we still have an owned

@Snickertastic Now, let me ask you a question: You are a member with little contribution to the community. Four years with just 226 visits and just 71 comments. That's OK.

If your new provider and on a budget it would dig a hole in your pocket pretty fast. If your smart I'd skip even looking at WHMCS there are better billing systems out there that are more affordable.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

I commented on the WHT thread about WHMCS bumping rates so if you want to add your 2 pence go for it.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

Hi everyone! we're trying to fix the mess left behind, we paid all bills to the NL provider to keep the server online, but sadly the IP provider terminated the contract for unpaid bills and for being

Hi everyone! we're trying to fix the mess left behind, we paid all bills to the NL provider to keep the server online, but sadly the IP provider terminated the contract for unpaid bills and for being

Solusvm works fine on my WHMCS.

Sucks though I guess I won't get WHMCS now that sucks

Yes I am. Now the issue now they did up it to level 2 and worked on it like 8 hours then they sent me the issue to open a ticket with WHMCS they said its SolusVM that provides support for the module