You can say that you are still getting some value based on the price you paid, but don't just let them off the hook by saying it's cheap so their incompetence is ok.

(Quote)

Yeah, i have seen this quite a bit too. Especially the cheap garbage brands just love the practice but if you are buying online you can never be 100% certain what to expect.

No dude. 30% packet loss is a fundamental failure. I can understand being ok with slow performance because the thing is cheap, but this isn't poor performance. This is completely broken.

Looking for a cheap VPS (IPv6-only is perfectly fine) with the following requirements:

Need something not listed below? Not a problem, dm me or hit me up on telegram @budgetvm1

If you want cheap 10G go with @1gservers

I'm looking for cheap (less is better but max 2-3$/m) servers with Turkey location. 1Gb 1C 1G is enough, i would like a few hours of free trial so i can test it.

Grab some money and start a propper "company". Buy a cheap reseller from a reputable company and try to get some from this. Slow grow is the healtiest grow.

(Quote)

To everyone considering SoftshellWeb: think twice. For $6.95/month you might get cheap specs, but when something goes wrong you get treated like this. Not worth it at all.

To everyone considering SoftshellWeb: think twice. For $6.95/month you might get cheap specs, but when something goes wrong you get treated like this. Not worth it at all.

(Quote)

(Quote)

As I am scaling my infrastructure to accommodate my domains, a 4-day response lag presents a significant SLA Risk to my operations. I require a status update on these technical queries immediately to

with these Geekbench results, hm. They are still cheap and good enough for the price, but don't advertise them as anything else, you even said otherwise.

Usage: Gameserver. Offshore due it being a private server

One of the domains they host on server.maxko-hosting.com is kayossecurity.com.

I wish I had cheap Tokyo chickens 😆

(Quote)