But the merchant is gone with the money, its not like every chargeback take money from Eric or whoever is this guy.. Even Eric said he dont care if someone do chargeback or not. I dont know why you ev

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

You’re thinking about bank accounts; Eric is thinking about infrastructure. Even if he doesn't have the old merchant account, he’s using the same IPs, the same domains, and the same data center contra

he does not have access to the previous Velox merchant accounts.

You say 'no one is taking money from your wallet,' but that’s exactly what a mass wave of chargebacks does. How do you think the servers stay on? Eric uses the company funds to pay the data center and

Encouraging a mass wave of chargebacks is the quickest way to ensure nobody gets service. Chargebacks freeze merchant assets, meaning the money needed to pay the data centers for your VPS uptime disap

(Quote)

I mean, the obvious answer to that is that the merchant could sue you. Or call the police on you, since it's a criminal dispute at that point not just a civil one.

And congratulations—not only have you lost service, but now you have to listen to the merchant's plea: “We're having a tough time, please be patient.”

No, while I do enforce it, it is the customer's bank to decide to do frictionless flow or challenge one (I have no influence over it as a merchant)

​Also, his logic on chargebacks is a total bluff. If he truly 'bought' the company, he bought the merchant account's reputation along with it. No 'new owner' would be indifferent to a wave of chargeba

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

How do oeop> @rpqu said:

(Quote)