we agree we got bashed by adly for them claiming they was better than us on our vps panel we had in development, and now there trying to claim there better than whmcs, no offense but we feel this is c

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

@Nekki if you can live without fancy whmcs/solus/virtualizor but plain proxmox I can hook you up with 2vC/2GB/100GB at OVH, for like... 25€ a year? ;-)

(Quote)

(Quote)

... and I wouldn't dare to attempt matching just 10% of features of WHMCS within one year or making any money out of it.

We could offer this at $14/month including Windows 2008 R2 license. This would be in London (or soon our West coast location) on NVMe SSD storage

Forget that, you need to concentrate on hitting feature parity. This is what you aren't getting, you can't start to write software with features WHMCS doesn't have first, you need to get it to the sam

like that totally missing from others that WHMCS has had for years.

(Quote)

For now. What can’t WHMCS do that others can’t?

This is the most retarded answer I've ever heard for why WHMCS is better. "it's not, it's like choosing an iPhone over nokia." False. WHMCS physically has more features/functions. If

With all due respect, your attitude is already dismissive off the bat; just don't be a dick; several people here have you asked why you think WHMCS sucks, with evidence, too many people are quick to s

(Quote)

(Quote)

I’m sorry you feel this way. I’m no ‘kid in a bedroom’ and I fully respect WHMCS; it’s industry standard for a reason. I’m looking for area to move from forward, from a providers perspective.

Everything that WHMCS can do but cheaper and you better remake all the common plugins too if you want uptake.

OK; let’s say I’ll release billing software within 30 days which surpasses WHMCS which we will be free until at least 01/01/2019. What features do providers want?