(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

No, me neither. Especially with a free service it kind of defeats the purpose (in my opinion at least - i associate free with convenient and hassle free) and also puts a bunch of additional burden on

Sad days when "free" means "abuse me"...

(Quote)

Not a fan of recommending KYC as abuse mitigation measure, but increasing efforts required to get free resources is the way to go. Some healthy restrictions such as outbound 25/tcp blocked upon reques

There was the spot of free webhosting, dying by years cause everything getting blacklisted or limited. Thinking of this will happen too for free services, otherwise it wont work for the long run.

Free stuff will always be abused. Either try to be really strict or ask for some sort of payment verification.

(Quote)

it's open source, feel free to make a PR and i'll happily merge and upload to mozilla

Well, maybe? Somewhat? So Peter Peterson (cocksucker1488@freedickmail.com, https://github.com/sombody/totallymyproject) is dragged in front of the internet to be scolded for his bad deeds? I doubt Lar

"Free" is and had been always a dangerous way. At least a lifetime price would save most of clients from morons abusing the system.

I am saying that most of the people who offered free services already gave up. I had been around the internet back in 2000s. Almost everything was free. The concept of "paying" for a

(Quote)

Free service is dead because people figured out it's the best target for abuse. They have nothing to lose. They can just move to another "free" service once you suspend them.