*Free anycast DNS management (Rage4)

VPN, ZNC, Static Web Hosting (+ light weight MyISAM dependent dynamics), Tor Bridge (there should be more of these, not more relays), IRC Bot, DNS, Reverse Proxy, SIP, Certificate Authority (for the k

Bind doesn't do split DNS forwarders, per queried domain name.

Is there Reverse DNS access?

@gbshouse uhm yes, but I don't want to add "fixed" entries, .local. (and all subdomains etc) requests has to go to local dns server (10.x.x.1 and 10.x.x.2), other requests (.) to goo

+1 dnsmasq does this ("split DNS" depending on domainname)

@MuZo - no, just put: 1.2.3.4 blah.local and skip the default DNS stuff. The order of resolution is hosts, DNS so if the entry does not exists in hosts it will be picked from your default DNS

Instead of setting up DNS server just put the entries into hosts file http://www.jafaloo.com/windows-hosts-file/

I would like to setup a local dns server on my pc to forward all xxx.local dns request to the local dns server, but every other request to google dns.

@gbshouse: as with most things, I'm pretty sure some kind of hybrid solution will prove most effective here; not one big lever, but rather many small levers. Call it a "Thinking DNS"

@andrzej - there is one problem with latency based GeoDNS and anycast networks. With anycast your network provider picks the shortest BGP path to our DNS server but it's shortest from network point of

autumn we are going to release new version of DNS service which will include many new features and improvements including those from feature request list

Bind9's Default View exists to provide DNS records when NO OTHER View matches. Rage4 have Global and First Closest which will respond with ALL records that match (Global records AND the First Closes

BUT they are more costly than Rage4. Other DNS hosting options are here

Besides Amazon, is there any other latency based DNS service? I tried Rage4. But its GeoDNS not always work well. Sometimes, it will provide an incorrect IP to one location far away. I guess IP locati

ago, because I was trying to use afraid.org for dns service). This is a very wrong practice from Spamhaus to block a whole /24 range of ip's because just 3 (!!!) ip's in this range was doing spam act

* the VM is unmanaged, the customer is responsible for all aspects of managing their VM server, including patching, installing and maintaining applications, firewalling and DNS.

dns.he.net

Already mentioned dns.he.net and ClouDNS.net - I am using both. Also, DNSExit.

dns.he.net is backed by a pretty big operation, but I never used them extensively because I was intimidated by non-colourful control panels.