(Quote)

I am saying that creating something like MXRoute itself might feel mismash now but its certainly possible.

MXRoute is one all inclusive solution. What you're describing now is a mismash soup of multiple providers you need to manually setup to work with each other.

(Quote)

But MXRoute is better. Becuase even if mail.baby fails, MXRoute succeeds in delivering the message.

(Quote)

Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong but if I were to design infra about something like this, I mean either I would use @onidel / @Hetzner_OL for the servers similar to how MXroute did.

but now it raises me the question to all the people who said MXRoute is one and unique in their price point.

With MXRoute and other companies, you just sign up, pay one (often small) fee for a crazy amount of resources (Like who the hell is actually using more than like 10GB of email storage? But everyone of

(Quote)

Honestly, but then why would people use MXRoute then if they can use mail.baby direclty then?

(Quote)

(Quote)

even mxroute use them

Current reiteration is relying on MailBaby for that, too, but have enjoyed SMPT2Go and MxRoute as a failback choice for relaying outbound.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

There's a thread about MXRoute no longer seeking customers from LET so some people were looking for a place to go.