All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
TLS 1.0/1.1 deprecated in 03/2021. Wouldja disable them on SMTP/MTA by 08/2026 and not lose emails?
TLS 1.0 and 1.1 were officially declared deprecated by the IETF in March 2021.
Google's Gmail still supports TLS 1.0, 1.1 and 3DES (outbound only) for compatibility with legacy systems.
If you ask a lot of seasoned admins, TLS 1.0 looks dead for email, TLS 1.1 is mostly used by scanners and spammers, with some real traffic, but rare. How does everyone feel about removing receive/send support for everything lower than TLS 1.2 currently.
I understand we have enough room to do best TLS magic with IMAPS/submissions or webmail, but when it comes to SMTP/MTA, there is always this feeling to continue to allow TLS 1.0/1.1 for now until the big ESPs start dropping support.
Dear Email Hosting providers:
How many emails have you received/sent with TLS 1.0/1.1 on SMTP/MTA over the period of past 12 months? This will help assess the risk of disabling TLS 1.0/1.1 by August 2026.
What are your thoughts?
Thank you!
- As an Admin, I only send/receive with:34 votes
- >=TLSv1.255.88%
- >=TLSv1.320.59%
- TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.317.65%
- TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3  5.88%

Comments
Anything bellow 1.2 is a lazzy ass admin job. Deny it.
is cool in theory, in practice may lose emails? Don't you think so? I have confirmation from admins who are still receiving emails with TLS 1.1.
Mentally strong people use PQC only.
A+ TLS security is good, until you realize how email works! We should unquestionably set up the best TLS ciphers and protocols for IMAPS and submissions. Also, focus on better authentication methods, including client certificate (mTLS) authentication.
REJECT with clear error message served is enough. Why support legacy? All big email providers use TLS 1.3. Everything else is irrelevant if not up to standard.
It depends who sends you emails. If most of your emails come from the big ESPs, that's fine. If you are dealing with normies in Australia who still use telco emails (can Bigpond please just
rm -rf/itself already), then you're better off supporting SSLv2.Bold statement. Much required.
Interestingly one of the biggest email provider Gmail is still lingering on to TLS 1.0 and even 3DES. Same with others including Zoho etc.
Was Microsoft forced to write this? https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/compliance/anz/pspf-tls-encryption?source=recommendations
THIS!
rejecting is not losing. silently dropping would be.
This is a great way to proceed!
what problem are you trying to solve
The point can be made that any encryption is better than none, since email can still generally be sent unencrypted.
That said, my mail servers are configured for minimum tls v1.1.
Good topic. I hadn't thought about this recently, and noticed I hadn't updated my settings for tls v1.3, yet.
Do we have to worry even a bit when we configure our SMTP/MTA for a minimum of TLSv1.2, as both 1.0 and 1.1 have been deprecated since March 2021?
Thank you for the input. Version 1.1 is still relevant as per a few seasoned admins.
TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3, never rejected anything important. Also not aware of any modern MTA that
will default to 1.0/1.1 when sending, so basically you shouldn't lose anything.
Thank you for your input!
Sorry for a blunt response. How do you know? Do you monitor? If so, what % of transport use TLS 1.3 in your case?
With respect.
i was too short, what i was implying is it's not a real issue.
what are you actually accomplishing with this change besides checking off a box?
personally i would rather leave it be than risk losing a single email.
the big mailers are going to have lots more stats than us so i'll follow their lead on this.
reject does sound ok except odds are the person seeing it will be confused.
edge cases are where you burn hours and i don't have any hours to spare.
i'm not saying you shouldn't do it, but some of my thoughts.
If you follow 2 big email providers, Gmail supports it and Microsoft doesn't.
Local big provider Zoho supports it too.
Thank you for your thoughts. I appreciate it.
I think that depends on microsoft and google,if they both blocked it,then update you setting to be same,just like centos6,centos7,windows 2008,all out of date,but still many using these systems.
Over 99% of legit emails were 1.3. I only receive proper RFC formatted mails and that means some misconfigured php mail() spam will be rejected anyway. As for spam I don't really care/monitor, chances are they use old compromised boxes with older TLS versions
if any encryption at all. All big corps default to 1.3, also all transactional mail providers
like Mailchimp and similar ones. I don't really expect anything from telco emails so no idea about what version they default to, but I would assume it's minimum 1.2.
TLS for Mail: M3AAWG Baseline Recommendations
good stats. do you run a relatively big server or is a personal server?
Yes, correct. Just because something is deprecated doesn't mean it's technically unacceptable or dysfunctional immediately.
If you need some legacy software to still work, just setup a proper smtp server that accepts your legacy submission (over a tunnel or just local) and then sends it proper with anything modern. Nothing can be that important that its send by a 90s dialup server.
Just a personal server, that's why I can be pretty aggressive when it comes to filtering and
fine tuning. Even false positives/negatives are tolerable. Having said that, I dont think I rejected anything important, worst case it will go to spam when it shouldn't.
Okay, and you are fine with >=TLSv1.2, correct?
I am sticking to Go's defaults as of yet basically supports TLS 1.0 but . I use TLS 1.3 + mTLS for auth with submissions/IMAPs [implicit TLS].
Although not a cool way to grade but my MX gets A+ here:
https://luxsci.com/smtp-tls-checker/
Great suggestion!
With smtp/MTA you don't know who you need to work with. Maybe this is why big providers still support older TLS protocols.
Thank you!
I think the big issue with tls 1.0/1.1 is poor quality ciphers. I have tls 1.1 enabled, but only for high quality ciphers:
I've seen exactly one comment here worth thinking about, the last one from @david.
I myself accept all email connections. Why?
Btw., every version so far has later been found to be unsatisfying or even not really secure so far, while the vast majority of users was convinced to be totally safe. That will hold true for the current versions as well, sorry. Btw, greetings to the nsa.
Don't the vulnerabilities come from the protocol-level implementation, not the cipher suite itself?
And with any reasonable MTA, it should go well, isn't it?
While we are at it, please jot them down for me.