Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
Godlike VPS
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2025 - MEGATHREAD

16364666869376

Comments

  • @Blembim said:
    maybe i'm not in a linux enterprise field, but can someone explain me why some company prefer Commercial Distro like RHEL or SUSE. they got special support or something like that?

    This is going to sound as facetious as my comments about *aaS, but this is actually trying to be serious.

    In general, the bigger company is, the more the likely it is that having someone to blame and shout at when something goes wrong is more important than not having any problems in the first place.

    Stated differently, large companies generally would prefer something that works 99% of the time and a support contract to fix things for that 1% than a product that's so far worked 100% but doesn't offer any support contract in case it does fail. Obviously, the ideal is to be in that 100% bucket whilst also offering a support contract, but the occasional failure reminds the customer that the support is valuable. Perversely, there's also often a perception that when things break, it shows that they're complicated and so the people maintaining them are even more valuable.

    RedHat was one of the earliest model for charging for Linux support, although originally it was literally just support and all their custom changes were also available for free. There was quite a big stink at the time when they shifted to RHEL for enterprise features that they didn't release in the free RedHat, and ultimately that led to their original distribution dying out after CentOS took base RedHat and back-ported almost everything from RHEL to it.

    In my experience, most small companies would go with something like CentOS and try to do deal with any problems in-house with their "linux guy" because they've already accounted for paying him in the budget but a support contract is additional expense, but bigger companies take a different view - they've got budget for a certain number of developers because they're needed for feature work or whatever. They have an IT department to deal with provisioning servers and dealing with problems, and they in turn are usually worked pretty hard and so will often pay for support contracts to make their lives easier and can just add it to their budget saying it's a necessary expense, but also when stuff fails, the pressure isn't all on them personally as they can say "yeah, we've got blah company (who are THE EXPERTS) looking at it" and absolve themselves of the responsibilty.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @plumberg said:

    I think the new trend now is doing a hybrid of cloud and in-house.

    Lots of companies are feeling the heat of the ridiculous bills for being always available and being on the cloud.

    Most of the time it was just hype which led teams make a decision to go πŸ’― cloud only to realize it's not that Kool.

    In my last company, the data science teams were excited to move to the cloud, and they didn't realize how messed up the billing would be. Spun up a couple large ass 1tb ram clusters and forgot to terminate them after use. And a $ 6figure bill was slapped

    I warned them of this but they are like, stay out bruddah. We know what we doing.

    Was a nice.. I told you so moment...

    I agree

    Or at least ’in-house’ as in dedis with OVH/Hetzner, not always on-premise

    I also love how the lack of basically any deals turned this into a general discussion thread

  • @ralf said:
    This is going to sound as facetious as my comments about *aaS, but this is actually trying to be serious.

    In general, the bigger company is, the more the likely it is that having someone to blame and shout at when something goes wrong is more important than not having any problems in the first place.

    Stated differently, large companies generally would prefer something that works 99% of the time and a support contract to fix things for that 1% than a product that's so far worked 100% but doesn't offer any support contract in case it does fail. Obviously, the ideal is to be in that 100% bucket whilst also offering a support contract, but the occasional failure reminds the customer that the support is valuable. Perversely, there's also often a perception that when things break, it shows that they're complicated and so the people maintaining them are even more valuable.

    RedHat was one of the earliest model for charging for Linux support, although originally it was literally just support and all their custom changes were also available for free. There was quite a big stink at the time when they shifted to RHEL for enterprise features that they didn't release in the free RedHat, and ultimately that led to their original distribution dying out after CentOS took base RedHat and back-ported almost everything from RHEL to it.

    In my experience, most small companies would go with something like CentOS and try to do deal with any problems in-house with their "linux guy" because they've already accounted for paying him in the budget but a support contract is additional expense, but bigger companies take a different view - they've got budget for a certain number of developers because they're needed for feature work or whatever. They have an IT department to deal with provisioning servers and dealing with problems, and they in turn are usually worked pretty hard and so will often pay for support contracts to make their lives easier and can just add it to their budget saying it's a necessary expense, but also when stuff fails, the pressure isn't all on them personally as they can say "yeah, we've got blah company (who are THE EXPERTS) looking at it" and absolve themselves of the responsibilty.

    i can't read all that

  • @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:
    Who was your first vps provider?

    Not too proud , for me it was chicagovps

    NFOservers back in 2013. In fact, I still have a server with them and I've had it for almost 9 years:

    You signed up for this server on Friday, January 22, 2016

    Wow. Seems they are a good provider.

    They've been fairly reliable over the years for sure. Some blips here and there, but nothing crazy.

    I should do a YABS of the server I still have with them one day. I believe it's still on HDD (in RAID1 or something), so disk speeds are probably not the greatest, but not sure.

    Even big names get blips left and right
    It's commendable they have still managed to stay alive. This market is so saturated, profit margins are razor thin.

    Yeah would love to see the yabs

    Oh yeah, for sure. They're usually quite on the ball when it comes to issues (even minor issues with upstreams).

    Anyway, decided to check this server (and did some upgrades/reboot).

    2 vCPU / 2 GB RAM / 200 GB disk / 12 TB @ whatever max speed they have (some nws.sh tests gave me around ~2 Gbps) for 8.99 USD per month.

    Not IPv6-enabled apparently (I would have to contact support), but this is a mostly-idle server anyway so I don't really care :joy:

    YABS - No idea what happened with receive speeds here tbh:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-12-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Dec 30 11:58:00 AM EST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2800.285 MHz
    AES-NI     : βœ” Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
    VM Type    : XEN
    IPv4/IPv6  : βœ” Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
    ASN        : AS14586 Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
    Host       : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc
    Location   : Chicago, Illinois (IL)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/xvda2):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 55.44 MB/s   (13.8k) | 230.25 MB/s   (3.5k)
    Write      | 55.55 MB/s   (13.8k) | 231.46 MB/s   (3.6k)
    Total      | 111.00 MB/s  (27.7k) | 461.72 MB/s   (7.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 475.19 MB/s    (928) | 604.21 MB/s    (590)
    Write      | 500.44 MB/s    (977) | 644.45 MB/s    (629)
    Total      | 975.64 MB/s   (1.9k) | 1.24 GB/s     (1.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.21 Gbits/sec  | 23.8 Mbits/sec  | 85.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 501 Mbits/sec   | 96.2 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 877 Mbits/sec   | 23.8 Mbits/sec  | 182 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 612 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 230 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.76 Gbits/sec  | 74.4 Mbits/sec  | 47.3 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.46 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 17.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 42.4 Mbits/sec  | 137 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1381
    Multi Core      | 2508
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9689047
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 2 sec
    

    nws.sh - Removed the FAILED tests to make it a bit smaller:

    ---------------------------------- nws.sh ---------------------------------
          A simple script to bench network performance using speedtest-cli
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Version            : v2024.12.20
     Global Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash
     Region Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -r <region>
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
     CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2800.285 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 512 KB
     AES-NI             : βœ” Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ❌ Disabled
     Total Disk         : 196.8 GB (119.4 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 1.9 GB (473.9 MB Used)
     Total Swap         : 4.0 GB (135.5 MB Used)
     System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 18 min
     Load average       : 0.23, 0.68, 0.46
     OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 12
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 6.1.0-28-amd64
     Virtualization     : XEN
     TCP Control        :
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic Network Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     IPv6 Access        : ❌ Offline
     IPv4 Access        : βœ” Online
     ISP                : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
     ASN                : AS14586 Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
     Host               : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc
     Location           : Chicago, Illinois-IL, United States
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server
    
     ISP: Nuclearfallout Enterprises
    
     Nearest          0.67 ms     0.0%    1249.16 Mbps   5500.22 Mbps   Nitel - Chicago, IL
    
     Kochi, IN        237.15 ms   0.0%    42.43 Mbps     367.85 Mbps    Asianet Broadband - Cochin
     Bangalore, IN    265.34 ms   0.0%    29.34 Mbps     316.91 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
     Chennai, IN      274.74 ms   0.0%    2.23 Mbps      249.82 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
     Mumbai, IN       201.87 ms   0.0%    11.02 Mbps     340.90 Mbps    Tata Teleservices Ltd - Mumbai
     Delhi, IN        285.79 ms   0.0%    77.60 Mbps     279.58 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
    
     Seattle, US      49.37 ms    N/A     42.62 Mbps     994.13 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA
     Los Angeles, US  42.21 ms    0.0%    39.83 Mbps     1205.30 Mbps   ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     Dallas, US       22.36 ms    0.0%    67.94 Mbps     1199.43 Mbps   i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     Miami, US        34.25 ms    N/A     123.48 Mbps    828.98 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
     New York, US     16.64 ms    0.0%    1809.82 Mbps   2000.19 Mbps   GSL Networks - New York, NY
    
     London, UK       85.46 ms    0.0%    1713.54 Mbps   1049.41 Mbps   VeloxServ Communications - London
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avg DL Speed       : 434.08 Mbps
     Avg UL Speed       : 1194.39 Mbps
    
     Total DL Data      : 6.97 GB
     Total UL Data      : 14.38 GB
     Total Data         : 21.35 GB
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Duration           : 7 min 0 sec
     System Time        : 30/12/2024 - 12:20:25 EST
     Total Script Runs  : 93681
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

    Thnx

    Seems a bit heavy on the wallet considering it's hdd.
    But decent one overall

    Yeah I don't think it's a great deal or anything, it's just I've had it for so long it feels weird to cancel it lol. Luckily it's "only" $8.99 per month, which... is not that much if I compare it to other servers in my spreadsheet.

    Wait a sec "only"? how much you spendin' on this idling thing? :lol:

  • @ehab said:

    @ralf said:
    This is going to sound as facetious as my comments about *aaS, but this is actually trying to be serious.

    In general, the bigger company is, the more the likely it is that having someone to blame and shout at when something goes wrong is more important than not having any problems in the first place.

    Stated differently, large companies generally would prefer something that works 99% of the time and a support contract to fix things for that 1% than a product that's so far worked 100% but doesn't offer any support contract in case it does fail. Obviously, the ideal is to be in that 100% bucket whilst also offering a support contract, but the occasional failure reminds the customer that the support is valuable. Perversely, there's also often a perception that when things break, it shows that they're complicated and so the people maintaining them are even more valuable.

    RedHat was one of the earliest model for charging for Linux support, although originally it was literally just support and all their custom changes were also available for free. There was quite a big stink at the time when they shifted to RHEL for enterprise features that they didn't release in the free RedHat, and ultimately that led to their original distribution dying out after CentOS took base RedHat and back-ported almost everything from RHEL to it.

    In my experience, most small companies would go with something like CentOS and try to do deal with any problems in-house with their "linux guy" because they've already accounted for paying him in the budget but a support contract is additional expense, but bigger companies take a different view - they've got budget for a certain number of developers because they're needed for feature work or whatever. They have an IT department to deal with provisioning servers and dealing with problems, and they in turn are usually worked pretty hard and so will often pay for support contracts to make their lives easier and can just add it to their budget saying it's a necessary expense, but also when stuff fails, the pressure isn't all on them personally as they can say "yeah, we've got blah company (who are THE EXPERTS) looking at it" and absolve themselves of the responsibilty.

    i can't read all that

    TLDR:

  • Came for deals, got walls of text.

  • admaxadmax Member, Megathread Squad

    @cainyxues said:

    @plumberg said:

    @raza19 said:
    @AlexPads where de sudoku?

    He is custom writing it

    Man just need one 3 usd deal and couldn't even grab one can't just someone transfer me one :lol: wish @AlexPads dmed me a 3 usd coupon plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    +1

  • @ralf said:

    best thing to say and call

    @JabJab

  • @ralf said:

    @ehab said:

    @ralf said:
    This is going to sound as facetious as my comments about *aaS, but this is actually trying to be serious.

    In general, the bigger company is, the more the likely it is that having someone to blame and shout at when something goes wrong is more important than not having any problems in the first place.

    Stated differently, large companies generally would prefer something that works 99% of the time and a support contract to fix things for that 1% than a product that's so far worked 100% but doesn't offer any support contract in case it does fail. Obviously, the ideal is to be in that 100% bucket whilst also offering a support contract, but the occasional failure reminds the customer that the support is valuable. Perversely, there's also often a perception that when things break, it shows that they're complicated and so the people maintaining them are even more valuable.

    RedHat was one of the earliest model for charging for Linux support, although originally it was literally just support and all their custom changes were also available for free. There was quite a big stink at the time when they shifted to RHEL for enterprise features that they didn't release in the free RedHat, and ultimately that led to their original distribution dying out after CentOS took base RedHat and back-ported almost everything from RHEL to it.

    In my experience, most small companies would go with something like CentOS and try to do deal with any problems in-house with their "linux guy" because they've already accounted for paying him in the budget but a support contract is additional expense, but bigger companies take a different view - they've got budget for a certain number of developers because they're needed for feature work or whatever. They have an IT department to deal with provisioning servers and dealing with problems, and they in turn are usually worked pretty hard and so will often pay for support contracts to make their lives easier and can just add it to their budget saying it's a necessary expense, but also when stuff fails, the pressure isn't all on them personally as they can say "yeah, we've got blah company (who are THE EXPERTS) looking at it" and absolve themselves of the responsibilty.

    i can't read all that

    TLDR:

    Well those things don't get "fixed" easily so you are out of options :lol:

  • admaxadmax Member, Megathread Squad

    66

  • MS said:
    Came for deals, got walls of text.

    How long have you had your psychic powers? You're reading my mind.

  • @ralf said:

    @Blembim said:
    maybe i'm not in a linux enterprise field, but can someone explain me why some company prefer Commercial Distro like RHEL or SUSE. they got special support or something like that?

    This is going to sound as facetious as my comments about *aaS, but this is actually trying to be serious.

    In general, the bigger company is, the more the likely it is that having someone to blame and shout at when something goes wrong is more important than not having any problems in the first place.

    Stated differently, large companies generally would prefer something that works 99% of the time and a support contract to fix things for that 1% than a product that's so far worked 100% but doesn't offer any support contract in case it does fail. Obviously, the ideal is to be in that 100% bucket whilst also offering a support contract, but the occasional failure reminds the customer that the support is valuable. Perversely, there's also often a perception that when things break, it shows that they're complicated and so the people maintaining them are even more valuable.

    RedHat was one of the earliest model for charging for Linux support, although originally it was literally just support and all their custom changes were also available for free. There was quite a big stink at the time when they shifted to RHEL for enterprise features that they didn't release in the free RedHat, and ultimately that led to their original distribution dying out after CentOS took base RedHat and back-ported almost everything from RHEL to it.

    In my experience, most small companies would go with something like CentOS and try to do deal with any problems in-house with their "linux guy" because they've already accounted for paying him in the budget but a support contract is additional expense, but bigger companies take a different view - they've got budget for a certain number of developers because they're needed for feature work or whatever. They have an IT department to deal with provisioning servers and dealing with problems, and they in turn are usually worked pretty hard and so will often pay for support contracts to make their lives easier and can just add it to their budget saying it's a necessary expense, but also when stuff fails, the pressure isn't all on them personally as they can say "yeah, we've got blah company (who are THE EXPERTS) looking at it" and absolve themselves of the responsibilty.

    So, it something like large company pay external contractor(Redhat etc) that take responsiblity when shit happens with their distro, plus support or custom features stuff?

  • @cainyxues said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:
    Who was your first vps provider?

    Not too proud , for me it was chicagovps

    NFOservers back in 2013. In fact, I still have a server with them and I've had it for almost 9 years:

    You signed up for this server on Friday, January 22, 2016

    Wow. Seems they are a good provider.

    They've been fairly reliable over the years for sure. Some blips here and there, but nothing crazy.

    I should do a YABS of the server I still have with them one day. I believe it's still on HDD (in RAID1 or something), so disk speeds are probably not the greatest, but not sure.

    Even big names get blips left and right
    It's commendable they have still managed to stay alive. This market is so saturated, profit margins are razor thin.

    Yeah would love to see the yabs

    Oh yeah, for sure. They're usually quite on the ball when it comes to issues (even minor issues with upstreams).

    Anyway, decided to check this server (and did some upgrades/reboot).

    2 vCPU / 2 GB RAM / 200 GB disk / 12 TB @ whatever max speed they have (some nws.sh tests gave me around ~2 Gbps) for 8.99 USD per month.

    Not IPv6-enabled apparently (I would have to contact support), but this is a mostly-idle server anyway so I don't really care :joy:

    YABS - No idea what happened with receive speeds here tbh:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-12-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Dec 30 11:58:00 AM EST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2800.285 MHz
    AES-NI     : βœ” Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
    VM Type    : XEN
    IPv4/IPv6  : βœ” Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
    ASN        : AS14586 Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
    Host       : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc
    Location   : Chicago, Illinois (IL)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/xvda2):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 55.44 MB/s   (13.8k) | 230.25 MB/s   (3.5k)
    Write      | 55.55 MB/s   (13.8k) | 231.46 MB/s   (3.6k)
    Total      | 111.00 MB/s  (27.7k) | 461.72 MB/s   (7.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 475.19 MB/s    (928) | 604.21 MB/s    (590)
    Write      | 500.44 MB/s    (977) | 644.45 MB/s    (629)
    Total      | 975.64 MB/s   (1.9k) | 1.24 GB/s     (1.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.21 Gbits/sec  | 23.8 Mbits/sec  | 85.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 501 Mbits/sec   | 96.2 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 877 Mbits/sec   | 23.8 Mbits/sec  | 182 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 612 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 230 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.76 Gbits/sec  | 74.4 Mbits/sec  | 47.3 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.46 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 17.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 42.4 Mbits/sec  | 137 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1381
    Multi Core      | 2508
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9689047
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 2 sec
    

    nws.sh - Removed the FAILED tests to make it a bit smaller:

    ---------------------------------- nws.sh ---------------------------------
          A simple script to bench network performance using speedtest-cli
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Version            : v2024.12.20
     Global Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash
     Region Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -r <region>
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
     CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2800.285 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 512 KB
     AES-NI             : βœ” Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ❌ Disabled
     Total Disk         : 196.8 GB (119.4 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 1.9 GB (473.9 MB Used)
     Total Swap         : 4.0 GB (135.5 MB Used)
     System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 18 min
     Load average       : 0.23, 0.68, 0.46
     OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 12
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 6.1.0-28-amd64
     Virtualization     : XEN
     TCP Control        :
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic Network Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     IPv6 Access        : ❌ Offline
     IPv4 Access        : βœ” Online
     ISP                : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
     ASN                : AS14586 Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
     Host               : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc
     Location           : Chicago, Illinois-IL, United States
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server
    
     ISP: Nuclearfallout Enterprises
    
     Nearest          0.67 ms     0.0%    1249.16 Mbps   5500.22 Mbps   Nitel - Chicago, IL
    
     Kochi, IN        237.15 ms   0.0%    42.43 Mbps     367.85 Mbps    Asianet Broadband - Cochin
     Bangalore, IN    265.34 ms   0.0%    29.34 Mbps     316.91 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
     Chennai, IN      274.74 ms   0.0%    2.23 Mbps      249.82 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
     Mumbai, IN       201.87 ms   0.0%    11.02 Mbps     340.90 Mbps    Tata Teleservices Ltd - Mumbai
     Delhi, IN        285.79 ms   0.0%    77.60 Mbps     279.58 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
    
     Seattle, US      49.37 ms    N/A     42.62 Mbps     994.13 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA
     Los Angeles, US  42.21 ms    0.0%    39.83 Mbps     1205.30 Mbps   ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     Dallas, US       22.36 ms    0.0%    67.94 Mbps     1199.43 Mbps   i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     Miami, US        34.25 ms    N/A     123.48 Mbps    828.98 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
     New York, US     16.64 ms    0.0%    1809.82 Mbps   2000.19 Mbps   GSL Networks - New York, NY
    
     London, UK       85.46 ms    0.0%    1713.54 Mbps   1049.41 Mbps   VeloxServ Communications - London
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avg DL Speed       : 434.08 Mbps
     Avg UL Speed       : 1194.39 Mbps
    
     Total DL Data      : 6.97 GB
     Total UL Data      : 14.38 GB
     Total Data         : 21.35 GB
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Duration           : 7 min 0 sec
     System Time        : 30/12/2024 - 12:20:25 EST
     Total Script Runs  : 93681
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

    Thnx

    Seems a bit heavy on the wallet considering it's hdd.
    But decent one overall

    Yeah I don't think it's a great deal or anything, it's just I've had it for so long it feels weird to cancel it lol. Luckily it's "only" $8.99 per month, which... is not that much if I compare it to other servers in my spreadsheet.

    Wait a sec "only"? how much you spendin' on this idling thing? :lol:

    I don't like looking at the number for total cost, but it's... a bit.

    At least the first row in my spreadsheet is the header, so it's only 94!

  • @cainyxues said:

    @lovelyserver said:

    @cainyxues said:

    @lovelyserver said:

    @plumberg said:

    @lovelyserver said:
    Page 61. Any $ 6.1 / y deals?

    Not $3/year?

    I'll take any. As soon as we get something

    And then please transfer one to me too :lol:

    I can transfer the invoice to you, and I'll keep the service. Is that alright?

    well the person who has the invoice and his name on it gets the service so :wink:

  • @Blembim said:

    So, it something like large company pay external contractor(Redhat etc) that take responsiblity when shit happens with their distro, plus support or custom features stuff?

    In short, YES

  • @cainyxues said:
    Well those things don't get "fixed" easily so you are out of options :lol:

    nice to meet your acquaintance

    get ready

  • @Decicus said:

    @cainyxues said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:
    Who was your first vps provider?

    Not too proud , for me it was chicagovps

    NFOservers back in 2013. In fact, I still have a server with them and I've had it for almost 9 years:

    You signed up for this server on Friday, January 22, 2016

    Wow. Seems they are a good provider.

    They've been fairly reliable over the years for sure. Some blips here and there, but nothing crazy.

    I should do a YABS of the server I still have with them one day. I believe it's still on HDD (in RAID1 or something), so disk speeds are probably not the greatest, but not sure.

    Even big names get blips left and right
    It's commendable they have still managed to stay alive. This market is so saturated, profit margins are razor thin.

    Yeah would love to see the yabs

    Oh yeah, for sure. They're usually quite on the ball when it comes to issues (even minor issues with upstreams).

    Anyway, decided to check this server (and did some upgrades/reboot).

    2 vCPU / 2 GB RAM / 200 GB disk / 12 TB @ whatever max speed they have (some nws.sh tests gave me around ~2 Gbps) for 8.99 USD per month.

    Not IPv6-enabled apparently (I would have to contact support), but this is a mostly-idle server anyway so I don't really care :joy:

    YABS - No idea what happened with receive speeds here tbh:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-12-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Dec 30 11:58:00 AM EST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2800.285 MHz
    AES-NI     : βœ” Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
    VM Type    : XEN
    IPv4/IPv6  : βœ” Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
    ASN        : AS14586 Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
    Host       : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc
    Location   : Chicago, Illinois (IL)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/xvda2):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 55.44 MB/s   (13.8k) | 230.25 MB/s   (3.5k)
    Write      | 55.55 MB/s   (13.8k) | 231.46 MB/s   (3.6k)
    Total      | 111.00 MB/s  (27.7k) | 461.72 MB/s   (7.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 475.19 MB/s    (928) | 604.21 MB/s    (590)
    Write      | 500.44 MB/s    (977) | 644.45 MB/s    (629)
    Total      | 975.64 MB/s   (1.9k) | 1.24 GB/s     (1.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.21 Gbits/sec  | 23.8 Mbits/sec  | 85.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 501 Mbits/sec   | 96.2 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 877 Mbits/sec   | 23.8 Mbits/sec  | 182 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 612 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 230 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.76 Gbits/sec  | 74.4 Mbits/sec  | 47.3 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.46 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 17.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 42.4 Mbits/sec  | 137 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1381
    Multi Core      | 2508
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9689047
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 2 sec
    

    nws.sh - Removed the FAILED tests to make it a bit smaller:

    ---------------------------------- nws.sh ---------------------------------
          A simple script to bench network performance using speedtest-cli
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Version            : v2024.12.20
     Global Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash
     Region Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -r <region>
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
     CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2800.285 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 512 KB
     AES-NI             : βœ” Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ❌ Disabled
     Total Disk         : 196.8 GB (119.4 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 1.9 GB (473.9 MB Used)
     Total Swap         : 4.0 GB (135.5 MB Used)
     System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 18 min
     Load average       : 0.23, 0.68, 0.46
     OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 12
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 6.1.0-28-amd64
     Virtualization     : XEN
     TCP Control        :
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic Network Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     IPv6 Access        : ❌ Offline
     IPv4 Access        : βœ” Online
     ISP                : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
     ASN                : AS14586 Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
     Host               : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc
     Location           : Chicago, Illinois-IL, United States
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server
    
     ISP: Nuclearfallout Enterprises
    
     Nearest          0.67 ms     0.0%    1249.16 Mbps   5500.22 Mbps   Nitel - Chicago, IL
    
     Kochi, IN        237.15 ms   0.0%    42.43 Mbps     367.85 Mbps    Asianet Broadband - Cochin
     Bangalore, IN    265.34 ms   0.0%    29.34 Mbps     316.91 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
     Chennai, IN      274.74 ms   0.0%    2.23 Mbps      249.82 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
     Mumbai, IN       201.87 ms   0.0%    11.02 Mbps     340.90 Mbps    Tata Teleservices Ltd - Mumbai
     Delhi, IN        285.79 ms   0.0%    77.60 Mbps     279.58 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
    
     Seattle, US      49.37 ms    N/A     42.62 Mbps     994.13 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA
     Los Angeles, US  42.21 ms    0.0%    39.83 Mbps     1205.30 Mbps   ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     Dallas, US       22.36 ms    0.0%    67.94 Mbps     1199.43 Mbps   i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     Miami, US        34.25 ms    N/A     123.48 Mbps    828.98 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
     New York, US     16.64 ms    0.0%    1809.82 Mbps   2000.19 Mbps   GSL Networks - New York, NY
    
     London, UK       85.46 ms    0.0%    1713.54 Mbps   1049.41 Mbps   VeloxServ Communications - London
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avg DL Speed       : 434.08 Mbps
     Avg UL Speed       : 1194.39 Mbps
    
     Total DL Data      : 6.97 GB
     Total UL Data      : 14.38 GB
     Total Data         : 21.35 GB
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Duration           : 7 min 0 sec
     System Time        : 30/12/2024 - 12:20:25 EST
     Total Script Runs  : 93681
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

    Thnx

    Seems a bit heavy on the wallet considering it's hdd.
    But decent one overall

    Yeah I don't think it's a great deal or anything, it's just I've had it for so long it feels weird to cancel it lol. Luckily it's "only" $8.99 per month, which... is not that much if I compare it to other servers in my spreadsheet.

    Wait a sec "only"? how much you spendin' on this idling thing? :lol:

    I don't like looking at the number for total cost, but it's... a bit.

    At least the first row in my spreadsheet is the header, so it's only 94!

    DAMN

    Thanked by 2Decicus plumberg
  • Just took my hourly dose, anyone else need theirs?

  • @Decicus said:
    Just took my hourly dose, anyone else need theirs?

    Well, you are not the one in need of this with so many idlers :lol:

    Thanked by 2Decicus plumberg
  • admaxadmax Member, Megathread Squad

    I think I need to sleep to cope.

  • @cainyxues said:

    @Decicus said:
    Just took my hourly dose, anyone else need theirs?

    Well, you are not the one in need of this with so many idlers :lol:

    That's where you're wrong, I always need MOAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Decicus said:

    @plumberg said:
    Who was your first vps provider?

    Not too proud , for me it was chicagovps

    NFOservers back in 2013. In fact, I still have a server with them and I've had it for almost 9 years:

    You signed up for this server on Friday, January 22, 2016

    Wow. Seems they are a good provider.

    They've been fairly reliable over the years for sure. Some blips here and there, but nothing crazy.

    I should do a YABS of the server I still have with them one day. I believe it's still on HDD (in RAID1 or something), so disk speeds are probably not the greatest, but not sure.

    Even big names get blips left and right
    It's commendable they have still managed to stay alive. This market is so saturated, profit margins are razor thin.

    Yeah would love to see the yabs

    Oh yeah, for sure. They're usually quite on the ball when it comes to issues (even minor issues with upstreams).

    Anyway, decided to check this server (and did some upgrades/reboot).

    2 vCPU / 2 GB RAM / 200 GB disk / 12 TB @ whatever max speed they have (some nws.sh tests gave me around ~2 Gbps) for 8.99 USD per month.

    Not IPv6-enabled apparently (I would have to contact support), but this is a mostly-idle server anyway so I don't really care :joy:

    YABS - No idea what happened with receive speeds here tbh:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-12-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Dec 30 11:58:00 AM EST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2800.285 MHz
    AES-NI     : βœ” Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
    VM Type    : XEN
    IPv4/IPv6  : βœ” Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
    ASN        : AS14586 Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
    Host       : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc
    Location   : Chicago, Illinois (IL)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/xvda2):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 55.44 MB/s   (13.8k) | 230.25 MB/s   (3.5k)
    Write      | 55.55 MB/s   (13.8k) | 231.46 MB/s   (3.6k)
    Total      | 111.00 MB/s  (27.7k) | 461.72 MB/s   (7.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 475.19 MB/s    (928) | 604.21 MB/s    (590)
    Write      | 500.44 MB/s    (977) | 644.45 MB/s    (629)
    Total      | 975.64 MB/s   (1.9k) | 1.24 GB/s     (1.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.21 Gbits/sec  | 23.8 Mbits/sec  | 85.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 501 Mbits/sec   | 96.2 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 877 Mbits/sec   | 23.8 Mbits/sec  | 182 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 612 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 230 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.76 Gbits/sec  | 74.4 Mbits/sec  | 47.3 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.46 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 17.1 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 42.4 Mbits/sec  | 137 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1381
    Multi Core      | 2508
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9689047
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 2 sec
    

    nws.sh - Removed the FAILED tests to make it a bit smaller:

    ---------------------------------- nws.sh ---------------------------------
          A simple script to bench network performance using speedtest-cli
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Version            : v2024.12.20
     Global Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash
     Region Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -r <region>
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
     CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2800.285 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 512 KB
     AES-NI             : βœ” Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ❌ Disabled
     Total Disk         : 196.8 GB (119.4 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 1.9 GB (473.9 MB Used)
     Total Swap         : 4.0 GB (135.5 MB Used)
     System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 18 min
     Load average       : 0.23, 0.68, 0.46
     OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 12
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 6.1.0-28-amd64
     Virtualization     : XEN
     TCP Control        :
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic Network Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     IPv6 Access        : ❌ Offline
     IPv4 Access        : βœ” Online
     ISP                : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
     ASN                : AS14586 Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.
     Host               : Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc
     Location           : Chicago, Illinois-IL, United States
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server
    
     ISP: Nuclearfallout Enterprises
    
     Nearest          0.67 ms     0.0%    1249.16 Mbps   5500.22 Mbps   Nitel - Chicago, IL
    
     Kochi, IN        237.15 ms   0.0%    42.43 Mbps     367.85 Mbps    Asianet Broadband - Cochin
     Bangalore, IN    265.34 ms   0.0%    29.34 Mbps     316.91 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
     Chennai, IN      274.74 ms   0.0%    2.23 Mbps      249.82 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
     Mumbai, IN       201.87 ms   0.0%    11.02 Mbps     340.90 Mbps    Tata Teleservices Ltd - Mumbai
     Delhi, IN        285.79 ms   0.0%    77.60 Mbps     279.58 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
    
     Seattle, US      49.37 ms    N/A     42.62 Mbps     994.13 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA
     Los Angeles, US  42.21 ms    0.0%    39.83 Mbps     1205.30 Mbps   ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     Dallas, US       22.36 ms    0.0%    67.94 Mbps     1199.43 Mbps   i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     Miami, US        34.25 ms    N/A     123.48 Mbps    828.98 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
     New York, US     16.64 ms    0.0%    1809.82 Mbps   2000.19 Mbps   GSL Networks - New York, NY
    
     London, UK       85.46 ms    0.0%    1713.54 Mbps   1049.41 Mbps   VeloxServ Communications - London
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avg DL Speed       : 434.08 Mbps
     Avg UL Speed       : 1194.39 Mbps
    
     Total DL Data      : 6.97 GB
     Total UL Data      : 14.38 GB
     Total Data         : 21.35 GB
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Duration           : 7 min 0 sec
     System Time        : 30/12/2024 - 12:20:25 EST
     Total Script Runs  : 93681
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

    Thnx

    Seems a bit heavy on the wallet considering it's hdd.
    But decent one overall

    Yeah I don't think it's a great deal or anything, it's just I've had it for so long it feels weird to cancel it lol. Luckily it's "only" $8.99 per month, which... is not that much if I compare it to other servers in my spreadsheet.

    Woah....

    How many servers and avg price ?

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @cainyxues said:

    @plumberg said:

    @raza19 said:
    @AlexPads where de sudoku?

    He is custom writing it

    Man just need one 3 usd deal and couldn't even grab one can't just someone transfer me one :lol: wish @AlexPads dmed me a 3 usd coupon plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Oh he will. $3 off the highest plan one time use. Works, right?

  • Epic games is running free games giveaway so whoever wants may go and collect them

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • @plumberg said:

    @cainyxues said:

    @plumberg said:

    @raza19 said:
    @AlexPads where de sudoku?

    He is custom writing it

    Man just need one 3 usd deal and couldn't even grab one can't just someone transfer me one :lol: wish @AlexPads dmed me a 3 usd coupon plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Oh he will. $3 off the highest plan one time use. Works, right?

    NAAH

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    Alright, who can assist me in running a giveaway using the lovely @FAT32 feat? Got little time, but <3 to give. Dm me.

  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad

    @Saragoldfarb said:
    Alright, who can assist me in running a giveaway using the lovely @FAT32 feat? Got little time, but <3 to give. Dm me.

    Can help you if you want.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    @plumberg said:

    I think the new trend now is doing a hybrid of cloud and in-house.

    Lots of companies are feeling the heat of the ridiculous bills for being always available and being on the cloud.

    Most of the time it was just hype which led teams make a decision to go πŸ’― cloud only to realize it's not that Kool.

    In my last company, the data science teams were excited to move to the cloud, and they didn't realize how messed up the billing would be. Spun up a couple large ass 1tb ram clusters and forgot to terminate them after use. And a $ 6figure bill was slapped

    I warned them of this but they are like, stay out bruddah. We know what we doing.

    Was a nice.. I told you so moment...

    I agree

    Or at least ’in-house’ as in dedis with OVH/Hetzner, not always on-premise

    I also love how the lack of basically any deals turned this into a general discussion thread

    Do your magic bud. We are gonna enjoy your presence for a few hours only.

    Thanked by 2Saragoldfarb emgh
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @lukast__ said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:
    Alright, who can assist me in running a giveaway using the lovely @FAT32 feat? Got little time, but <3 to give. Dm me.

    Can help you if you want.

    Cool, I'll send you a dm

This discussion has been closed.