Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with OpenID
Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

In this Discussion

morher of summer

morher of summer

TazTaz Disabled
edited July 2012 in General

Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

Comments

  • PhilNDPhilND Member

    /facepalm

    https://nodedeploy.com | Premium VPS Solutions | Managed

  • Looks legit... Ordering a couple of 16GB dedicated VPS right now.

  • 512GB of ram?

    Yeah... Not happenin

  • GUYS! Someone make a fake package for a 512GB RAM VPS for $7/mo.

  • KairusKairus Member

    @bijan588 Why not? The post is obviously talking about the node having 512gb. Looking at their IP address they're at WebNX who does custom servers with up to 512gb. The offer is 16gb for $50.

    If the node has 512gb, say reserve 8 for the host OS. That's 31 16GB instances, so $1550/month. I'm not sure what a server like that would cost. I assume more than that per month though :P.

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Member
    edited July 2012

    @Kairus said: @bijan588 Why not? The post is obviously talking about the node having 512gb. Looking at their IP address they're at WebNX who does custom servers with up to 512gb. The offer is 16gb for $50.

    If the node has 512gb, say reserve 8 for the host OS. That's 31 16GB instances, so $1550/month. I'm not sure what a server like that would cost. I assume more than that per month though :P.

    Reserve 8GB for the OS? This is one hell of a OS..

    I highly doubt they have a 512GB server.

    Managed to build a similar server at a server configurator at liquidweb, ends at about 5.5k monthly, with 100mbps port. Add another 500-600$ for dedicated 1gbps

  • KairusKairus Member
    edited July 2012

    @LiquidHost 8gb for shits and giggles! I don't know how much ram the OS services would need in that case.

  • @Kairus said: Why not? The post is obviously talking about the node having 512gb. Looking at their IP address they're at WebNX who does custom servers with up to 512gb. The offer is 16gb for $50.

    That would cost a fuckton, when I used to rent servers I had a 128GB form DatabaseByDesign, it costed 700 a month.

  • DamianDamian Member
    edited July 2012

    FWIW, I was playing around with Dell server configurator and came up with a Dell R815 with 4x Opteron 6272's= 64 cores, 512gb of ram, and 6 TB of disk space, for $14,833, or "As low as $371.00/mo." through Dell business credit. Not that unreasonable.

    So If they manage to sell capacity, then they'll be quite a bit ahead, depending on their colo costs. Since it's OVZ, they'll be able to interleave other containers, too, so they'll actually be able to sell more than 31 containers.

    FWIW, the jump from 256gb of ram to 512gb of ram was $7520 :D

    I am no longer affiliated with IPXcore.
    Thanked by 1klikli
  • KuroKuro Member

    @Damian said: FWIW, the jump from 256gb of ram to 512gb of ram was $7520 :D

    Most quad socket G34 boards I've seen only support 16 DIMMs so that price jump is going from fairly inexpensive 16GB DIMMs to over priced 32GB DIMMs :D

  • DerekDerek Member

    Supermicro H8QGi-F-O - $729.99 Samsung DDR3-1600 16GB ECC/REG - 32x$154.99 = 4,959.68 AMD Opteron 16-Core 6272 4x$485.99 = $1,943.96 Supermicro CSE-825TQ-R700LPB - $545.99 LSI MegaRAID SAS LSI9265-8i - $626.99 HGST H3IK40003272SP 4TB 7200 RPM - 16x329.99 = 5,279.84

    $14,086.45 and I highly doubt they used this configuration. Just to get a idea :&

  • @bijan588 Meh, can get it for half that now a days

    Offering The Best In VPS, Dedicated and Shared Hosting: Fliphost.net
  • gsrdgrdghdgsrdgrdghd Member without signature

    If anyone is interested, here is their real whois (on the left side)

  • image

    I use http://tuxlite.com to configure all my VPSes and I love it!

  • The offer is 100% legitimate and the node specs are exactly as listed. Can gladly testify it to a mod if required.

    Thanked by 1NanoG6
  • RandyRandy Disabled

    How will buy that?

  • TazTaz Disabled

    Baahumbag.

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • budingyunbudingyun Member
    edited August 2012
  • vahevahe Member

    Where is @hostbluff

  • They have a new master configuration: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1184278

    Guess the last one got filled....

  • Just for the sake of clarity, below is a benchmark test from a live VPS.

    ========== [root@wh3 /]# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2000.141 MHz Total amount of ram : 2048 MB Total amount of swap : 0 MB System uptime : 3 days, 4:50, Download speed from CacheFly: 91.6MB/s Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 17.7MB/s Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 16.8MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.01MB/s Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 8.03MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 640KB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.64MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 15.8MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 22.8MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 46.6MB/s I/O speed : 430 MB/s

    [root@wh3 /]#

    Agreed, may not be ideal, but for the price we ask and for someone offering 24x7 support in true sense, is that really a bad deal? I can list atleast 50 top providers who cannot beat this price-spec combo for even two times of what we ask. I am not trying to draw any conclusions, neither do we intend to post any brand names in here.

    I have said this earlier and I ll say it again. Its almost pointless to argue over such forums on whether or not the offer is a legitimate one especially when it is obvious to be stormed across majorly by other providers. I ll leave this to the end users to take a call on this and decide for themselves.

    We do not make fake posts, claims. No high promises. You will get exactly what is assured, probably more but no less. Your resources are dedicated and we have a strict zero overselling policy.

    I have said this in my earlier post. If any mod wishes to testify any of our posted info, we will gladly do that.

  • RandyRandy Disabled

    @vahe said: Where is @hostbluff

    He will post here soon i guess

  • gsrdgrdghdgsrdgrdghd Member without signature

    @web_host said: The offer is 100% legitimate and the node specs are exactly as listed.

    Sure, go ahead and proof the node specs :) What hardware are you using?

  • TazTaz Disabled

    @web_host said: I can list atleast 50 top providers who cannot beat this price-spec combo for even two times of what we ask. I am not trying to draw any conclusions, neither do we intend to post any brand names in here.

    If that is the case, you have no idea about your competitions. That is the most stupid comment I have ever seen in my whole stupid life (after Randy ).

    And that benchmark? That doesn't clarify anything. I can pull up one of my fresh empty node and get more than 500mb/s. Big deal. Don't anger BigTim, CicsoFran and Italiano.

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

    Thanked by 1klikli
  • gsrdgrdghdgsrdgrdghd Member without signature

    I've googled a bit and it seems that this site is also owned by the same guy. Anyone want to try out the login data?

  • Sure, go ahead and proof the node specs :) What hardware are you using?

    If you did read it properly, I did say MODERATOR. So go ahead and flag the post to a mod. I repeat, if any mod is willing to testify the authenticity of any of my posts (not just this one), I would be more than happy to do so.

    If that is the case, you have no idea about your competitions. That is the most stupid comment I have ever seen in my whole stupid life (after Randy ).

    You seem to presume too much and make absurd assumptions about many things that you probably have no clue about. You probably thought that I am exaggerating over the number 50 and possibly have no clue about my competition. Well, I have tried many of the top providers (By top, I mean providers owning 2k+ servers and having their own facility). Now if you re-read my above post, I clearly said, for the price-spec combo.

    And that benchmark? That doesn't clarify anything. I can pull up one of my fresh empty node and get more than 500mb/s. Big deal. Don't anger BigTim, CicsoFran and Italiano.

    That node had 7 VPSs when this was tested. Below are the stats (straight from Solus):

    V Servers 7 Total Ram 28 GB Total Burst 28 GB Alloc BW 12.7 TB VT openvz
    Used BW 56.68 GB Used IP 23

    Point number 1 applies here too. Just flag this post and we will gladly testify all of what we said to a mod.

    I've googled a bit and it seems that this site is also owned by the same guy. Anyone want to try out the login data?

    Yes you are correct. It is one of our reseller servers. The SS was probably taken as a part of some troubleshooting steps.

  • @web_host said: Total Ram 28 GB Total Burst 28 GB

    Aren't we talking about the 512GB ram server here though? The results of this server is totally unrelated I'd say.

    Internap VPS, Web Hosting and more - Cloud Shards | Need a VPS Upgrade?
    Query Foundry, LLC AS62638
  • TazTaz Disabled

    No I am not assuming but proving a fact. Price-spec combo? Any one can beat that price. Even my tiny ass can match (actually beat) that price. Will I do it? No. . There are more bottleneck than storage and memory. If a client requires that much resource, he/she is better of with a dedi from fdcservers/dshack. You are talking about DC owners? May I know who and how you have approached?

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • @concerto49 said: Aren't we talking about the 512GB ram server here though? The results of this server is totally unrelated I'd say.

    Thats the assigned resources to the VMs not the nodal resources. The nodal resources still remains as claimed.

    @Taz_NinjaHawk said: No I am not assuming but proving a fact. Price-spec combo? Any one can beat that price. Even my tiny ass can match (actually beat) that price. Will I do it? No. . There are more bottleneck than storage and memory. If a client requires that much resource, he/she is better of with a dedi from fdcservers/dshack. You are talking about DC owners? May I know who and how you have approached?

    I don't know why you are taking this personally. This is what I said earlier "I can list atleast 50 top providers who cannot beat this price-spec combo for even two times of what we ask." If you re read this again I am comparing my quoted package against the price combo offered by some of the top 50 providers. I have also specified my criteria of electing a company as a top provider. You are somehow taking this from an egoistic point when you say "Any one can beat that price. Even my tiny ass can match (actually beat) that price. Will I do it? No." If I ask you to list 10 providers who are publicly making such an offer, i am pretty sure, you will have a hard time making that list. Whether or not someone should opt for a dedicated for such a config is a different discussion all together. Also I do not intend to list any providers in this post as that would be close to direct slandering in my opinion.

    Also you continue to misjudge me with your choice of words ("approached") ... what do you mean approached?. I have been a customer of many of these top 50 in my list and still continue to have VPSs from a lot of them (Again, I am okay with a mod verification).

    Just to make this very clear once again. I did not say that they may not offer better pricing OR better specs/ performance VPSs. I only said that they do not offer a better price-spec combo than what we do. In case you still haven't comprehended, I meant that even if these providers have to offer a similar or better specs/performance VPS, the price will certainly NOT be of what we do. (Also note that I am referring to publicly displayed prices)

    Bottom line: We have been in this business for quite some time (wouldn't say too long, because that would be incorrect), have enough funds in hand to sustain quite a few of these high end specs, have several hundreds of satisfied clients on board and offer 24 x 7 support in true sense. Do you really think we could have survived this far with such huge financial expenses and making such hoax claims?

  • concerto49concerto49 Member
    edited August 2012

    @web_host said: Thats the assigned resources to the VMs not the nodal resources. The nodal resources still remains as claimed.

    64 Core AMD Quad 6272 Processors ★★★★★ 512 GB DDR3 RAM ★★★★★

    This is what I found in the linked thread on the first post.

    @web_host said: CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz

    Intel VMs on an AMD node? Virtualization technology these days is awesome.

    Otherwise, can you please stick to giving out info from the 1 node/VM? If not, it's a moot point.

    Internap VPS, Web Hosting and more - Cloud Shards | Need a VPS Upgrade?
    Query Foundry, LLC AS62638
  • @Alex_LiquidHost said: They have a new master configuration: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1184278

    Guess the last one got filled....

    @concerto49 said: Intel VMs on an AMD node? Virtualization technology these days is awesome.

    Otherwise, can you please stick to giving out info from the 1 node/VM? If not, it's a moot point.

    That node is already full and we are no longer using it for new accounts. This is our latest offering and my response was to Alex's post when I mentioned the specs.

  • If you want to give me a login I'll run a test on the described node.

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • ZenZen Member

    Based on your promise of not overselling at all you can make a maximum of $320 on the 512GB nodes.. this new 128GB node you just deployed can make you $80.

    Doesn't matter what you argue.. you're bullshitting at some point.

    I work for Nodisto.

  • @Zen said: Based on your promise of not overselling at all you can make a maximum of $320 on the 512GB nodes.. this new 128GB node you just deployed can make you $80.

    Doesn't matter what you argue.. you're bullshitting at some point.

    Before using such harsh comments I would strongly recommend that you visit the URL atleast once and review the pricing once again. I am quite curious to know how does it account to $80.

    For the sake of the majority of readers, I would also like to add that WHT is NOT our primary means of client generation. It only accounts to a small percentage of promotional customers whom whom we offer or pass over a good deal. Most providers are willing to spend thousands of $$$ in advertisements none of which gets them an immediate revenue for the buck spent, so what is wrong if I choose to pass over the benefit to the customers in turn. For the majority of our customers we still have our website pricing which is way different and quite higher than what we advertise on WHT. As a matter of fact, we started advertising on WHT lately.

    I see this discussion going nowhere and in my personal opinion the only ones who deserve to make a public opinion about our services are the ones who have truely tried our services for a decent time. Performance good or bad, do not jump to immediate conclusions. Treat us as a normal provider and I am sure the majority wouldn't be disappointed.

    Thanked by 1NanoG6
Sign In or Register to comment.