Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


TheHostingSquad 1GB 30GB 100GB XEN Benchmark - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

TheHostingSquad 1GB 30GB 100GB XEN Benchmark

24

Comments

  • i have issued @ErawanArifNugroho another vps on another node, let see how this one goes

  • edited August 2012

    CPU Info :

    # cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor       : 0
    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 58
    model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
    stepping        : 9
    cpu MHz         : 3300.020
    cache size      : 8192 KB
    fdiv_bug        : no
    hlt_bug         : no
    f00f_bug        : no
    coma_bug        : no
    fpu             : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level     : 10
    wp              : yes
    flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt
    bogomips        : 8252.62
    
    processor       : 1
    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 58
    model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
    stepping        : 9
    cpu MHz         : 3300.020
    cache size      : 8192 KB
    fdiv_bug        : no
    hlt_bug         : no
    f00f_bug        : no
    coma_bug        : no
    fpu             : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level     : 10
    wp              : yes
    flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc up pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt
    bogomips        : 8252.62
    
    processor       : 2
    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 58
    model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
    stepping        : 9
    cpu MHz         : 3300.020
    cache size      : 8192 KB
    fdiv_bug        : no
    hlt_bug         : no
    f00f_bug        : no
    coma_bug        : no
    fpu             : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level     : 10
    wp              : yes
    flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc up pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt
    bogomips        : 8252.62
    
    processor       : 3
    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 58
    model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
    stepping        : 9
    cpu MHz         : 3300.020
    cache size      : 8192 KB
    fdiv_bug        : no
    hlt_bug         : no
    f00f_bug        : no
    coma_bug        : no
    fpu             : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level     : 10
    wp              : yes
    flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc up pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt
    bogomips        : 8252.62
    

    Memory Info

    # cat /proc/meminfo
    MemTotal:      1048760 kB
    MemFree:        994092 kB
    Buffers:          2520 kB
    Cached:          20876 kB
    SwapCached:          0 kB
    Active:          10004 kB
    Inactive:        16024 kB
    HighTotal:      303112 kB
    HighFree:       277248 kB
    LowTotal:       745648 kB
    LowFree:        716844 kB
    SwapTotal:     1081336 kB
    SwapFree:      1081336 kB
    Dirty:              16 kB
    Writeback:           0 kB
    AnonPages:        2744 kB
    Mapped:           3936 kB
    Slab:             5044 kB
    PageTables:        356 kB
    NFS_Unstable:        0 kB
    Bounce:              0 kB
    CommitLimit:   1605716 kB
    Committed_AS:    38352 kB
    VmallocTotal:   114680 kB
    VmallocUsed:      1960 kB
    VmallocChunk:   112228 kB
    

    Freevps.sh

    # wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
    Number of cores : 4
    CPU frequency :  3300.020 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 1024 MB
    Total amount of swap : 1055 MB
    System uptime :   3 min,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 11.3MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 9.75MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 11.2MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.18MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 6.28MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 4.67MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 2.80MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.76MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 3.52MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 9.98MB/s
    I/O speed :  99.1 MB/s
    

    Network Test

    # wget  cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
    --2012-08-15 18:08:17--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `100mb.bin'
    
    100%[===================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 11.4M/s   in 8.9s
    
    2012-08-15 18:08:26 (11.3 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600/104857600]
    
  • edited August 2012

    Inodes

    # df -i
    Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
    /dev/sda1            3932160   20600 3911560    1% /
    

    Disk Space

    # df -h
    Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda1              30G  840M   28G   3% /
    

    IOPING

    # dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf iotest
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 10.7913 seconds, 99.5 MB/s
    
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 10.7919 seconds, 99.5 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 10.9155 seconds, 98.4 MB/s
    
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 12.8111 seconds, 83.8 MB/s
    
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 25.433 seconds, 42.2 MB/s
    
    **********************************
    dd (sequential disk speed test)...
    **********************************
    dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 11.1101 seconds, 96.6 MB/s
    
    ************************
    starting ioping tests...
    ***************************************************
    ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
    ***************************************************
    disk I/O: /dev/sda1
    --- /dev/sda1 (device 30.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4118.2 ms, 54 iops, 0.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 10.7/18.6/30.3/9.0 ms
    
    disk I/O: /dev/sda2
    --- /dev/sda2 (device 1.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4050.8 ms, 132 iops, 0.5 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 5.9/7.6/11.8/2.1 ms
    
    **********************************************
    seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
    **********************************************
    seek rate: /dev/sda1
    --- /dev/sda1 (device 30.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
    312 requests completed in 3004.2 ms, 131 iops, 0.5 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 1.6/7.6/18.8/2.6 ms
    
    seek rate: /dev/sda2
    --- /dev/sda2 (device 1.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
    355 requests completed in 3009.2 ms, 158 iops, 0.6 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.3/6.3/22.9/3.0 ms
    
    **********************************************
    sequential test (default 1MB working set)
    **********************************************
    -----------------------
    sequential: /dev/sda1
    --- /dev/sda1 (device 30.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
    238 requests completed in 3007.6 ms, 92 iops, 23.0 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 9.3/10.9/66.5/3.8 ms
    -----------------------
    sequential cached I/O: /dev/sda1
    --- /dev/sda1 (device 30.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
    745 requests completed in 3002.3 ms, 1309 iops, 327.3 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.8/8.4/0.7 ms
    
    -----------------------
    sequential: /dev/sda2
    --- /dev/sda2 (device 1.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
    225 requests completed in 3007.4 ms, 87 iops, 21.7 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 9.4/11.5/48.4/3.3 ms
    -----------------------
    sequential cached I/O: /dev/sda2
    --- /dev/sda2 (device 1.0 Gb) ioping statistics ---
    747 requests completed in 3002.3 ms, 1329 iops, 332.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.8/9.3/0.7 ms
    
    # ioping . -c 5
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/root): request=1 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/root): request=2 time=0.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/root): request=3 time=0.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/root): request=4 time=0.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/root): request=5 time=0.3 ms
    
    --- . (ext3 /dev/root) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4015.7 ms, 3549 iops, 13.9 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.3/0.3/0.0 ms
    
    
    # ioping . -R
    
    --- . (ext3 /dev/root) ioping statistics ---
    452 requests completed in 3002.2 ms, 254 iops, 1.0 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/3.9/20.8/3.6 ms
    

    Traceroute and Ping

    # traceroute cachefly.cachefly.net
    traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
     1  TheHostingSquad.com (69.162.67.137)  0.837 ms  1.120 ms  1.364 ms
     2  vl54.cr02-62.core1.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.255.65)  0.791 ms  0.790 ms  0.782 ms
     3  te3-3.core1.bdr2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.57)  0.757 ms te3-3.core1.bdr1.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.49)  0.755 ms te3-3.core1.bdr2.dllstx3.dallas-idc.com (208.115.192.57)  0.748 ms
     4  208.175.175.101 (208.175.175.101)  1.048 ms 1-192-115-208.reverse.lstn.net (208.115.192.1)  0.733 ms 208.175.175.101 (208.175.175.101)  1.034 ms
     5  208.175.175.101 (208.175.175.101)  1.272 ms 208.175.175.66 (208.175.175.66)  0.707 ms 208.175.175.101 (208.175.175.101)  1.258 ms
     6  ae2-70G.csr2.DAL2.gblx.net (67.16.151.82)  0.683 ms  8.637 ms  0.699 ms
     7  te8-2-10G.ar2.DAL2.gblx.net (67.16.151.181)  0.683 ms po6.ar2.DAL2.gblx.net (67.17.68.133)  0.984 ms po7.ar2.DAL2.gblx.net (67.16.130.161)  0.981 ms
     8  vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175)  0.976 ms po7.ar2.DAL2.gblx.net (67.16.130.161)  0.982 ms vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175)  0.970 ms
    
    # ping -c 10 cachefly.cachefly.net
    PING cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=0.993 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=1.15 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=1.04 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=1.08 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=1.06 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=1.13 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=1.15 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=1.08 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=1.10 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=10 ttl=57 time=1.15 ms
    
    --- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8999ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.993/1.097/1.158/0.053 ms
    
  • edited August 2012

    UnixBench

    
       #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
       #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
       #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
       #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
       #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
        ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
    
       Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
    
       Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                          Sunnyvale, CA, USA
       January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com
    
    
    1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    4 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: LET: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 05:38:01 EST 2012
       Machine: i686 (i386)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (8252.6 bogomips)
              MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (8252.6 bogomips)
              MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
       CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (8252.6 bogomips)
              MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
       CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (8252.6 bogomips)
              MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
       18:22:11 up 20 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.02, 0.24, 0.19; runlevel 3
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 15 2012 18:22:11 - 18:50:24
    4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       15898451.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     2875.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               2158.0 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        234803.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           58789.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        816300.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                              300478.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                  82862.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                               5099.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5462.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1264.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                         653060.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   15898451.2   1362.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2875.6    522.8
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2158.0    501.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     234803.6    592.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      58789.4    355.2
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     816300.8   1407.4
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     300478.9    241.5
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      82862.3    207.2
    Process Creation                                126.0       5099.3    404.7
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5462.2   1288.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1264.1   2106.9
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0     653060.1    435.4
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                         607.7
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 15 2012 18:50:24 - 19:18:54
    4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       53514974.5 lps   (10.1 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                    11033.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               5385.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        172177.3 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           45223.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        630421.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                              833670.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 206380.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                               7685.4 lps   (30.1 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  10125.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1518.4 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        2359811.8 lps   (10.1 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   53514974.5   4585.7
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      11033.3   2006.0
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5385.9   1252.5
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     172177.3    434.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      45223.5    273.3
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     630421.9   1086.9
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     833670.2    670.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     206380.2    516.0
    Process Creation                                126.0       7685.4    610.0
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      10125.3   2388.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1518.4   2530.7
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2359811.8   1573.2
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1095.4
    
    
  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    I/O is much better.

  • what did you do?

  • its my 2nd node, i guess should not have issued on my first node ( which has the amount of vps that jerland saw) the 2nd node is dedicated to linux boxes. i issued on the wrong node, now that i am aware of :)

    apologies. :)

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    You're on the right track, just don't cut corners on disk, it'll turn around to bite you later ;)

    Thanked by 1Randy
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    Yes, disk is the worst bottleneck. For xen or KVM not so much so because it provides better isolation and CPU can keep things under control, but for OVZ is the real killer.
    A node is built from the disk up. If you have poor disk, 32 gb is the max because it will never fill before the disk becomes unusable.
    M

    Thanked by 1jar
  • can anyone verify that those xen templetes are working? http://xentemplates.com/#

    their site seems broken ( a sub site of vps6.net)

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    That website has never worked.

    Thanked by 1Infinity
  • Failed. i guess they are trying to get publicity? :D

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    Yeah I think it's part of their SEO strategy. Their blog is good stuff though.

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    Why don't you use stacklet?

  • flyfly Member

    why don't you use your own templates? using templates from outside sources = security issue

  • there is no templates @fly

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    Use your own, you could also update them with your timezone and customize some other way.
    M

  • flyfly Member

    @Randy said: there is no templates @fly

    ?

  • These aren't the droids you're looking for.

  • RandyRandy Member
    edited August 2012

    would have to buy them that is the easy way out

    thats the annoying part with xen.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    Not really, install one basic debian and derive different templates from it, one for hosting, one bare, one for minecraft, whatever.
    I am not sure how this will playout in SolusVM as I dont use that to play with at work, however it should be simpler than in XCP, even.
    M

  • i will try that soon, i am kinda mad to migrate to WHMCS manually from CE , its crazy :)

  • TazTaz Member

    @Randy said: no worries. i will take your advice, and why is your name "Taz"?? its a girl's name ;P

    Lol no. Full name Tazwar. I like it short :)

  • @Taz_NinjaHawk said: Lol no. Full name Tazwar. I like it short :)

    and then why not using War? :D

  • TazTaz Member
    edited August 2012

    Edited out. No harm intended.

  • TazMahal :D

    Thanked by 1Taz
  • Mon5t3rMon5t3r Member
    edited August 2012

    that just remind me the Guns 'N Roses vocalist,, William Axl Rose (W.A.R.)

    edited as taz requested by pm

  • TazTaz Member

    @Mon5t3r said: William Axl Rose (W.A.R.)

    HAAHA!

  • Tazmanian Devil. LOLS

Sign In or Register to comment.