Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with OpenID
Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

In this Discussion

SemoWeb 64MB 5GB SSD 500GB OpenVZ Benchmark

SemoWeb 64MB 5GB SSD 500GB OpenVZ Benchmark

edited September 2012 in Reviews

Another test comes to SemoWeb SSD Offer, which come with :

Resources :
Memory 64 MB
vSwap 64 MB
Disk Space: 5 GB SSD
Bandwidth: 500GB
OpenVZ
1 IPv4
Node US - Orlando - Node 108 SSD

CPU Info

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3192.803
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 6385.60
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3192.803
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 1
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 2
initial apicid  : 2
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 6385.60
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 2
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3192.803
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 2
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 4
initial apicid  : 4
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 6385.60
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 3
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3192.803
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 3
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 6
initial apicid  : 6
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 6385.60
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Memory Info

# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:          65536 kB
MemFree:           29104 kB
Cached:            18940 kB
Active:            11608 kB
Inactive:           9924 kB
Active(anon):       2348 kB
Inactive(anon):      244 kB
Active(file):       9260 kB
Inactive(file):     9680 kB
Unevictable:           0 kB
Mlocked:               0 kB
SwapTotal:         65536 kB
SwapFree:          60792 kB
Dirty:                 0 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:          2592 kB
Shmem:              3076 kB
Slab:              14856 kB
SReclaimable:      12580 kB
SUnreclaim:         2276 kB

Freevps.sh

# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
Number of cores : 4
CPU frequency :  3192.803 MHz
Total amount of ram : 64 MB
Total amount of swap : 64 MB
System uptime :   9 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 74.1MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 12.7MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 15.5MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.02MB/s
Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 5.23MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 12.1MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.55MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 13.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 16.9MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 33.1MB/s
I/O speed :  838 MB/s

Download Test

# wget  cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
--2012-09-02 04:37:46--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 100mb.bin

100%[===================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 52.2M/s   in 1.9s

2012-09-02 04:37:48 (52.2 MB/s) - 100mb.bin
My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image

Comments

  • edited September 2012

    Inodes

    # df -i
    Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
    /dev/simfs           2621440   21921 2599519    1% /
    none                    8192     151    8041    2% /dev
    

    Disk Space

    # df -h
    Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/simfs            5.0G  705M  4.4G  14% /
    none                   32M  4.0K   32M   1% /dev
    

    IO Test

    # dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf iotest
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.36036 s, 789 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.83553 s, 157 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.69079 s, 635 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.49503 s, 195 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.43763 s, 197 MB/s
    

    IOPING

    dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.18346 s, 492 MB/s
    
    ************************
    starting ioping tests...
    ***************************************************
    ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
    ***************************************************
    disk I/O: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/5805) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4000.9 ms, 10225 iops, 39.9 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms
    
    **********************************************
    seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
    **********************************************
    seek rate: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/5805) ioping statistics ---
    28136 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 21034 iops, 82.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/7.5/0.1 ms
    
    **********************************************
    sequential test (default 1MB working set)
    **********************************************
    -----------------------
    sequential: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/5805) ioping statistics ---
    7875 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 3408 iops, 852.0 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.3/0.6/0.0 ms
    -----------------------
    sequential cached I/O: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/5805) ioping statistics ---
    22711 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 13012 iops, 3253.0 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/5.5/0.1 ms
    
    # ioping . -c 5
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/5805): request=1 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/5805): request=2 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/5805): request=3 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/5805): request=4 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/5805): request=5 time=0.1 ms
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/5805) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4001.1 ms, 9634 iops, 37.6 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms
    
    # ioping . -R
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/5805) ioping statistics ---
    27960 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 20843 iops, 81.4 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/8.9/0.1 ms
    

    Traceroute and Ping

    # traceroute cachefly.cachefly.net
    traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1  slave108ssd.hdnodez.com (199.168.190.130)  0.024 ms  0.008 ms  0.007 ms
     2  xe2-1-edge2.mco.dimenoc.com (72.29.88.33)  0.258 ms  0.320 ms  0.407 ms
     3  Te2-4.1123.ar1.MIA2.gblx.net (64.214.70.9)  8.438 ms  8.568 ms  8.668 ms
     4  po5.ar3.MIA2.gblx.net (67.16.145.53)  15.847 ms  15.673 ms  15.839 ms
     5  xe-4-0-0.cr1.mia1.us.nlayer.net (63.141.207.29)  6.645 ms  6.612 ms  6.616 ms
     6  vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175)  7.254 ms  7.094 ms  6.806 ms
    
    # ping -c 10 cachefly.cachefly.net
    PING cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=7.29 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=6.88 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=6.94 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=6.96 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=6.95 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=7.00 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=6.98 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=6.80 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=7.05 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_seq=10 ttl=58 time=7.19 ms
    
    --- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9018ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.808/7.010/7.295/0.145 ms
    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
  • edited September 2012

    UnixBench

       #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
       #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
       #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
       #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
       #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
        ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
    
       Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
    
       Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                          Sunnyvale, CA, USA
       January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com
    
    
    1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    4 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: ssd: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab059.7 -- #1 SMP Tue Jul 24 19:12:01 MSK 2012
       Machine: i686 (i386)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.6 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.6 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.6 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.6 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       04:58:13 up 32 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.01; runlevel 3
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Sun Sep 02 2012 04:58:13 - 05:26:21
    4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       24776919.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     3159.5 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               5055.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        944366.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          255027.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2230585.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             1832749.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 210241.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              16462.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   7128.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2141.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        2031450.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   24776919.2   2123.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3159.5    574.5
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5055.1   1175.6
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     944366.0   2384.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     255027.7   1541.0
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2230585.4   3845.8
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1832749.7   1473.3
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     210241.0    525.6
    Process Creation                                126.0      16462.4   1306.5
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       7128.5   1681.2
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2141.8   3569.6
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2031450.0   1354.3
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1531.6
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Sun Sep 02 2012 05:26:21 - 05:54:35
    4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       90258697.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                    12083.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                              21882.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1014119.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          280973.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3256389.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             6222091.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 578306.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              45573.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  16325.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1938.3 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        5400091.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   90258697.0   7734.2
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      12083.2   2196.9
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0      21882.0   5088.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1014119.3   2560.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     280973.3   1697.7
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3256389.5   5614.5
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    6222091.2   5001.7
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     578306.6   1445.8
    Process Creation                                126.0      45573.8   3617.0
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      16325.0   3850.2
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1938.3   3230.5
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    5400091.9   3600.1
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3410.0
    

    ServerBear benchmark

    http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/09/02/pMo9CKwMROnEjzG7
    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
  • Nice I/O.

  • Not bad, Not bad, surprised to see these results from @Semoweb!

    [email protected]
  • Very solid, not seen a 64mb plan with that performance before.

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • Wut? lol. :( time to buck up @jarland :) Arif, Stop wasting your money and buy candy for your kids.

    I doubt its a empty node tho

    Thanked by 1ErawanArifNugroho
  • In a month, redo the benchmark please.

  • KenshinKenshin Member
    edited September 2012

    @budingyun said: In a month, redo the benchmark please.

    Due to how SSD performs in general, unless there's major disk abuse it's unlikely to be overloaded. Not to mention it's really hard to abuse an SSD. Benchmark after 1 month won't change the numbers much.

    Asia VPS | Asia Dedicated Server OneAsiaHost - Singapore based Asia-Centric VPS & Dedicated Servers
    Thanked by 1ErawanArifNugroho
  • @Kenshin said: Due to how SSD performs in general, unless there's major disk abuse it's unlikely to be overloaded. Not to mention it's really hard to abuse an SSD. Benchmark after 1 month won't change the numbers much.

    For overall performance.

    Thanked by 1ErawanArifNugroho
  • I have a few smaller VPS's through SemoWeb, just for DNS basically. Though they are not SSD, I haven't had any real issues with them :)

    iWebSource - KVM & OpenVZ Solutions!

  • @ErawanArifNugroho Just curiosity. Did you buy all those servers or they gave it to you for free? `_^

  • @fway some were bought after the provider make the offer posted in LET, some were gifted :)

    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
    Thanked by 1fway
  • @iwebsource said: I have a few smaller VPS's through SemoWeb, just for DNS basically. Though they are not SSD, I haven't had any real issues with them :) Glad to hear, we want happy customers always! Thank you for hosting with us.

    Los Angeles VPS Inside of QuadraNet Datacenter http://semoweb.com/vps.html

Sign In or Register to comment.