Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with OpenID
Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

In this Discussion

SimpleNode 512MB 20GB 250GB OpenVZ Benchmark

SimpleNode 512MB 20GB 250GB OpenVZ Benchmark

edited August 2012 in Reviews

We have SimpleNode with the 512MB VPS Promo. They are started as Minecraft GSP but started to offer an OpenVZ VPS. So here is the resources :

   
512MB Promo
Resources :
Memory 512 MB
vSwap 256 MB
Disk Space: 20 GB
Bandwidth: 250GB
OpenVZ
1 IPv4
Node Beryllium

CPU Info

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 58
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 3491.925
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips        : 6983.85
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 58
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 3491.925
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 1
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 2
initial apicid  : 2
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips        : 6983.85
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Memory Info

# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:         524288 kB
MemFree:          347804 kB
Cached:           150952 kB
Active:           125496 kB
Inactive:          38164 kB
Active(anon):      12640 kB
Inactive(anon):       68 kB
Active(file):     112856 kB
Inactive(file):    38096 kB
Unevictable:           0 kB
Mlocked:               0 kB
SwapTotal:        262144 kB
SwapFree:         262144 kB
Dirty:              1232 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:         12708 kB
Shmem:              2624 kB
Slab:              12768 kB
SReclaimable:      10828 kB
SUnreclaim:         1940 kB

Freevps.sh

# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency :  3491.925 MHz
Total amount of ram : 512 MB
Total amount of swap : 256 MB
System uptime :   12 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 106MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 12.6MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 82.3MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.73MB/s
Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 9.15MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.0MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.45MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 22.8MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 30.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 26.9MB/s
I/O speed :  195 MB/s

Download Test

# wget  cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
--2012-08-18 03:33:50--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.bin'

100%[===================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 51.2M/s   in 2.0s

2012-08-18 03:33:52 (51.2 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600/104857600]

My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
Thanked by 1SimpleNode

Comments

  • edited August 2012

    Inodes

    # df -i
    Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
    /dev/simfs           10485760   29456 10456304    1% /
    tmpfs                  65536       4   65532    1% /lib/init/rw
    tmpfs                  65536       1   65535    1% /dev/shm
    

    Disk Space

    # df -h
    Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/simfs             20G  617M   20G   4% /
    tmpfs                 256M     0  256M   0% /lib/init/rw
    tmpfs                 256M     0  256M   0% /dev/shm
    

    IO Test

    # dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf iotest
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.60424 s, 192 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.85809 s, 183 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.1451 s, 175 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 37.7149 s, 28.5 MB/s
    
    ~# dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 405.717 s, 2.6 MB/s
    

    IOPING

    # wget http://vbtechsupport.com/ioping/ioping.zip
    # unzip ioping.zip
    # chmod +x ioping.sh
    # ./ioping.sh
    
    dd (sequential disk speed test)...
    **********************************
    dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.3298 s, 201 MB/s
    
    ************************
    starting ioping tests...
    ***************************************************
    ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
    ***************************************************
    disk I/O: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/128) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4001.5 ms, 5513 iops, 21.5 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms
    
    **********************************************
    seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
    **********************************************
    seek rate: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/128) ioping statistics ---
    1441 requests completed in 3009.0 ms, 494 iops, 1.9 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/2.0/27.8/3.1 ms
    
    **********************************************
    sequential test (default 1MB working set)
    **********************************************
    -----------------------
    sequential: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/128) ioping statistics ---
    2415 requests completed in 3000.9 ms, 865 iops, 216.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.6/1.2/38.2/1.4 ms
    -----------------------
    sequential cached I/O: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/128) ioping statistics ---
    27391 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 18637 iops, 4659.3 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms
    
    ~# ioping . -c 5
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/128): request=1 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/128): request=2 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/128): request=3 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/128): request=4 time=13.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/128): request=5 time=0.3 ms
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/128) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4014.7 ms, 355 iops, 1.4 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/2.8/13.3/5.2 ms
    
    # ioping . -R
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/128) ioping statistics ---
    1251 requests completed in 3004.0 ms, 428 iops, 1.7 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/2.3/28.2/3.6 ms
    

    Traceroute and Ping

    # traceroute cachefly.cachefly.net
    traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1  23.29.127.98 (23.29.127.98)  0.028 ms  0.015 ms  0.008 ms
     2  23.29.112.73 (23.29.112.73)  3.175 ms  3.177 ms  3.170 ms
     3  incero.corexchange.com (209.105.225.45)  0.603 ms  0.603 ms  0.778 ms
     4  tengigabitethernet2-2.asr1.dal2.gblx.net (208.48.236.129)  0.886 ms  0.952 ms  0.976 ms
     5  vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175)  0.966 ms  0.952 ms  0.944 ms
    
    # ping -c 10 cachefly.cachefly.net
    PING cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=1 ttl=55 time=0.966 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=2 ttl=55 time=1.01 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=3 ttl=55 time=0.899 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=4 ttl=55 time=1.19 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=5 ttl=55 time=1.13 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=6 ttl=55 time=1.15 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=7 ttl=55 time=0.936 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=8 ttl=55 time=0.945 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=9 ttl=55 time=1.06 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=10 ttl=55 time=1.07 ms
    
    --- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.899/1.039/1.194/0.103 ms
    
    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
    Thanked by 1SimpleNode
  • edited August 2012

    UnixBench

    # wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
    # tar -zxvf UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
    # cd UnixBench
    # make
    # ./Run
    
    
       #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
       #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
       #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
       #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
       #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
        ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
    
       Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
    
       Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                          Sunnyvale, CA, USA
       January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com
    
    
    1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    2 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: simple: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab059.7 -- #1 SMP Tue Jul 24 19:12:01 MSK 2012
       Machine: i686 (unknown)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (6983.9 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (6983.9 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       03:51:57 up 35 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00; runlevel 2
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 18 2012 03:51:57 - 04:20:01
    2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       23675777.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     3458.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               5998.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        797707.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          211803.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2332125.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             1216431.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 220712.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              19291.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9612.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1400.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                         915830.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   23675777.2   2028.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3458.8    628.9
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5998.6   1395.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     797707.5   2014.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     211803.0   1279.8
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2332125.9   4020.9
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1216431.8    977.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     220712.3    551.8
    Process Creation                                126.0      19291.2   1531.0
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9612.8   2267.2
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1400.6   2334.4
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0     915830.8    610.6
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1383.7
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 18 2012 04:20:01 - 04:48:08
    2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       47034945.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     6914.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                              12427.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1344599.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          362612.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3852486.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             2375780.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 275001.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              31279.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  13148.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1308.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        1720847.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   47034945.0   4030.4
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6914.8   1257.2
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0      12427.6   2890.1
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1344599.9   3395.5
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     362612.4   2191.0
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3852486.0   6642.2
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2375780.2   1909.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     275001.8    687.5
    Process Creation                                126.0      31279.3   2482.5
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      13148.3   3101.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1308.9   2181.4
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1720847.8   1147.2
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2265.8
    
    

    http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/18/ZHwUgQnVPoaYrVQr

    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
    Thanked by 1SimpleNode
  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member
    edited August 2012

    Thanks :)

    I have no idea why dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync is so poor. I'll look into it.

    Our older node that uses RAID1 instead of RAID10 gets better results... o.o

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

    Thanked by 1ErawanArifNugroho
  • Why do you want to use oflag=dsync in the first place?

  • I'm using the same io benchmark by @serverbear :)

    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
  • @rds100 said: Why do you want to use oflag=dsync in the first place?

    Well, it's for benchmarking I guess.... Oh well, I'm glad the other I/O tests are pretty good :P

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • serverbearserverbear Member
    edited August 2012

    We're adding FIO random reads and writes soon.

    Dsync is purely there for comparison atm, we don't use it in any reports (but it may highlight issues).

    Good benchmark tho.

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • HalfEatenPieHalfEatenPie Member
    edited August 2012

    @ErawanArifNugroho: if you want to say how much it costs also, that'd be awesome.

    Besides for that, solid stats.

    Catalyst Host - Pie Approved!
  • @HalfEatenPie said: if you want to say how much it costs also, that'd be awesome.

    $6 :P

    I'm actually pretty surprised by these results. We have a giant 100 player Tekkit (Minecraft mod pack that adds 200+ items to the game) server which uses a lot of resources running on that node, in addition to a few small servers.

    We're planning on adding more drives to this node, as Minecraft really does use a lot of I/O.

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • With a Minecraft running, but having a stable 195mb/s is nice :)

    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
  • @SimpleNode depend on kernel version and filesytem you're using. mostly the worst result for dsync is on kernel 32 and ext4 filesystem.

    Yes! I'm with Carstensz Pyramid Server Now stop asking me please :D
  • JarJar Member

    Incero really has a great network. Hardware looks good here too. Well done @SimpleNode

    Thanked by 1SimpleNode
  • @jarland said: Incero really has a great network. Hardware looks good here too.

    Hey, thanks! and indeed, their network is awesome.

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • RandyRandy Disabled

    @jarland said: Well done @SimpleNode

    what about me jarland =)

  • JarJar Member

    @Randy Give me some RAID10 benchmarks :)

  • RandyRandy Disabled
    edited August 2012

    @jarland, get ready, i will do my best :) i have been notified by LSN that the RAM Stocks should be ready by twmr :) OpenVZ here i come!

    Thanked by 1Jar
  • I think I've underestimated how big the Minecraft server market is (runs off to write a Minecraft benchmarking tool).

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • TazTaz Disabled

    @serverbear give it 1 year. It will be gone just like Other did.

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • @Taz_NinjaHawk said: @serverbear give it 1 year. It will be gone just like Other did.

    Minecraft?

    My blog | Server Uptime | I'm not working for any providers in here, all my comments just my own opinion.image
  • TazTaz Disabled

    Yep. Judging MC forum and how kids are coming with free shits, it will either die for lack of trust or providers will simply quit for the lack of fare competition. Just my opinion.

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • @Taz_NinjaHawk said: Yep. Judging MC forum and how kids are coming with free shits, it will either die for lack of trust or providers will simply quit for the lack of fare competition. Just my opinion.

    You are killing my dreams. I was thinking of starting a Minecraft brand in the begining of October

  • @Alex_LiquidHost said: I was thinking of starting a Minecraft brand in the begining of October

    MinecraftForums "Hosts" sorted by topic start date

    New host launched every ~3-6 hours. 70% think a Core i5 is enough for handling 32GB of minecraft servers, or that a Kimsufi-24G with no RAID has enough I/O to cope with 24GB of minecraft servers (their nodes eventually fill up, and get customers complaining about world loading lag).

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • TazTaz Disabled

    Minecraft situation is worst than cpanel hosting right now. On top of that, add dealing with little kids, cc charge without permission of parents and other fun.

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member
    edited August 2012

    Link I find this amusing.

    Okay look, All you other hosting companies are just fake. Seriously. 1gb connection for something with 600 users on would only take 35 mbps? Get real and stop trying to bribe them. Our offers actually make sense for those who know the statistics. 2 gb server won't hold 120 as a 4 gb server would hardly hold 100. SSD makes almost completely no f**king difference except the price. No one should be worried about gathering data quickly on something that can't even process the data as fast as it comes in. To everyone looking towards getting a MC server don't buy into that stupid sh*t. Do the math yourself and you can find out what is more realistic.

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • @SimpleNode said: I find this amusing.

    I find that very realistic. But nobody ever got rich providing what people need, only providing what people want.

    Hostigation High Resource Hosting - SolusVM OpenVZ/KVM VPS
  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member
    edited August 2012

    [removed]

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • @serverbear For some reason, on serverbear.com, searching "simplenode" doesn't get any results, even though erawan posted the stats here: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/18/ZHwUgQnVPoaYrVQr

    Also "SimpleNode" on the benchmark page isn't a link like on other results.

    I'm assuming that I just don't know how serverbear.com works :P. Do you have to manually verify results or something? O.o

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • @SimpleNode said: I'm assuming that I just don't know how serverbear.com works :P. Do you have to manually verify results or something? O.o

    I haven't added you guys yet, we don't auto generate hosts based on benchmarks added. Otherwise we'd have heaps of stuff we don't want appearing on the site.

    I'll get you up there in a few hours.

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • So.... @serverbear ... :P

    SimpleNode | Minecraft and VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX and Phoenix, AZ | PayPal and BitCoins accepted

  • I've added you, it'll go live next time I sync the data. Probably sometime in the next hour or so (got about 50 benchmarks to verify & assign).

    Thanks for the patience.

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
Sign In or Register to comment.