It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Shoot! If possible list failure rates you've had in the past. I'm drawn towards WD as usual but I've heard people having much lower failure rates with other brands (Seagate?) so please do the honours and scream at the top of your lungs the manufacturer you side with.
Comments
High rate of failure on WD in the first 6-8 months.... but after that it seems smooth sailing.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Disagree Agree ThanksI've had better reliability with my Seagates.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Disagree Agree ThanksSeagate/Hitachi.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Disagree Agree Thankshitachi deathstar?
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Disagree Agree ThanksSeagate Constellation ES(Quality Drive, 130MB/s Sustained) HD103SJ(Again, another Quality Drive, But slightly less at 125MB/s from new). The F3R 1TB, Which is the RAID Edition of HD103SJ(Not much difference at all, It's pretty much like how WD do a RAID Edition, Even though the standard Samsung drives can be used for HW Raid).
WD RE4, I only have bought one, and I haven't had chance to test it yet since it is a spare. I bought it because it has 5 Year warranty pretty much.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Disagree Agree ThanksI've recently been turned on to Toshiba 7.2k SAS drives. Reasonable price, proper SAS interface, and a 6gb/sec interface
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822149218
Before that, we were building systems with Seagate SV35 drives, and had absolutely no problems with them:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148912
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Disagree Agree Thanks