Hostslim 1GB 100GB 1TB OpenVZ Benchmark

ErawanArifNugroho

I just saw an offer in WHT

Here is the resources :

Disk Space: 100 GB
CPU Cores: 1
RAM: 1GB
Bandwidth: 1TB
1 IPv4
OpenVZ
Location Netherland

CPU Info

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3200.586
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 6401.17
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Memory Info

# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:        1048576 kB
MemFree:          468800 kB
Cached:           509316 kB
Active:           224428 kB
Inactive:         336372 kB
Active(anon):      51448 kB
Inactive(anon):       36 kB
Active(file):     172980 kB
Inactive(file):   336336 kB
Unevictable:           0 kB
Mlocked:               0 kB
SwapTotal:             0 kB
SwapFree:              0 kB
Dirty:              9788 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:         51484 kB
Shmem:              5636 kB
Slab:              18940 kB
SReclaimable:      16188 kB
SUnreclaim:         2752 kB

Freevps.sh

# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency :  3200.586 MHz
Total amount of ram : 1024 MB
Total amount of swap : 0 MB
System uptime :   13 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 45.2MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 3.24MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 3.86MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.64MB/s
Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 71.0MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 101MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.81MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.00MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 12.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 11.4MB/s
I/O speed :  48.7 MB/s

** Download Test**

]# wget  cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
--2012-08-04 07:29:53--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 100mb.bin

100%[===================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 27.9M/s   in 3.6s

2012-08-04 07:29:56 (27.9 MB/s) - 100mb.bin

ErawanArifNugroho

Inodes

# df -i
Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/simfs           52428800   21910 52406890    1% /
none                  131072     151  130921    1% /dev
none                  131072       1  131071    1% /dev/shm

Disk Space

# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs            100G  653M  100G   1% /
none                  512M  4.0K  512M   1% /dev
none                  512M     0  512M   0% /dev/shm

IOPING

# dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf iotest
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 15.4703 s, 69.4 MB/s


dd (sequential disk speed test)...
**********************************
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 20.6334 s, 52.0 MB/s

************************
starting ioping tests...
***************************************************
ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
***************************************************
disk I/O: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/141) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4029.6 ms, 171 iops, 0.7 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/5.8/16.9/6.9 ms

**********************************************
seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
seek rate: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/141) ioping statistics ---
1333 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 456 iops, 1.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/2.2/45.7/3.8 ms

**********************************************
sequential test (default 1MB working set)
**********************************************
-----------------------
sequential: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/141) ioping statistics ---
1760 requests completed in 3000.8 ms, 614 iops, 153.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.7/1.6/26.8/1.4 ms
-----------------------
sequential cached I/O: /
--- / (simfs /vz/private/141) ioping statistics ---
31261 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 24240 iops, 6060.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/2.1/0.0 ms

# ioping . -c 5
4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/141): request=1 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/141): request=2 time=0.3 ms
4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/141): request=3 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/141): request=4 time=0.2 ms
4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/141): request=5 time=0.4 ms

--- . (simfs /vz/private/141) ioping statistics ---
5 requests completed in 4001.8 ms, 3455 iops, 13.5 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.3/0.4/0.1 ms


# ioping . -R

--- . (simfs /vz/private/141) ioping statistics ---
1462 requests completed in 3008.6 ms, 500 iops, 2.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/2.0/32.3/3.2 ms

ErawanArifNugroho

UnixBench

   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

   Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA
   January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com


1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: vps.server.com: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab055.16 -- #1 SMP Fri Jun 8 19:22:28 MSD 2012
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6401.2 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   07:37:30 up 25 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.12, 0.22, 0.20; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 04 2012 07:37:30 - 08:05:39
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       21074983.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3043.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4336.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        768823.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          213525.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1799221.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1563995.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 146692.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              12019.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4441.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    486.3 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1749662.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   21074983.9   1805.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3043.0    553.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4336.9   1008.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     768823.5   1941.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     213525.3   1290.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1799221.8   3102.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1563995.0   1257.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     146692.6    366.7
Process Creation                                126.0      12019.5    953.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4441.1   1047.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        486.3    810.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1749662.2   1166.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1107.6

yomero

Interesting, but no ToS?

Jack

@yomero said: Interesting, but no ToS?

It's in serverius they ignore everything but spamhaus reports i think.

fan

Too good to be true, is the DC they use that cheap?

Jack

@fan said: is the DC they use that cheap?

No , Not really cheap as you can only colocate with the DC I guess they either do colo or they rent from a dedicated provider there.

Zen

No it isn't cheap. Had 15 servers with serverius at one point.

Jack

I bought one anyway can't say no to 1.50 euros :P

ErawanArifNugroho

I'm glad someone can make use my post :p

Zen

You might not want to waste money on this.. DD test still ongoing 2 minutes later..

Jack

@Zen said: You might not want to waste money on this.. DD test still ongoing 2 minutes later..

yea..

[root@vps ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 158.097 s, 6.8 MB/s [root@vps ~]#

Zen

Haha!

airski

Aha~

Looks like i am a little luck?

root@hostslim:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 18.4641 s, 58.2 MB/s

ErawanArifNugroho

Nice :)

Jeffrey

Hmm... Their regular VPS Plans are actually quite expensive.

Spirit

Their billing system don't work correct if you choose long term payment. Extra IPs, cPanel, etc... are free.

Example with semi-annual order without promo code: Quote: VPSSLIM - BASIC VPS » Control panel: Cpanel » Linux OS: Centos 5.x » Extra traffic: None » IP addresses: 2 » We advice you a support plan: None

[Edit Configuration] [Remove] € 46.94 EUR Subtotal: € 46.94 EUR Total Due Today: € 46.94 EUR Total Recurring: € 46.94 EUR Semi-Annually

ErawanArifNugroho

Maybe they did it on purpose

HalfEatenPie

lol.

Aka, purchasing cPanel license for 1 year actually reduces 1 euro. That's with full management and everything with 6 extra IPs and a ton of extra traffic.

ynzheng

so many price errr

serious for their offer and service

Spirit

Yeah they "fixed" pricing error which means that addons aren't free anymore however I am not sure if they know what they are doing because addons still apply under discount which means cPanel for 25% price, etc... I checked history of this host and they advertise VPS offers since 2010 which means they aren't so new and they should know it better... They have most likely good attempt however as @ynzheng said so many errors... if they run this promotion too long they will ruin themself I am afraid.

edit. they failed even WHT section to post offer. It's posted under "Cloud Hosting Offers" instead "VPS Hosting Offers". Strange.

BBTN

omg... can't... resist... damn addiction!

yomero

I am in a self-healing process since I got the Datashack dedi. But still I want to try this one xD

@Jack said: It's in serverius they ignore everything but spamhaus reports i think.

And still no ToS, so, I wonder if I can torrent hard or sth xD

ynzheng

No fixed yet

Vpsslim.com

http://www.hostslim.net

Mustbe one man:)

Spirit

Another hostslim.eu site http://www.host-slim.com/

MikHo

Pay annual and get cpanel for -1 usd

gsrdgrdghd

@Spirit said: http://www.host-slim.com/

lol :D

64mb RAM and 15GB traffic for 7$/month? Sounds reasonable!

Spirit

Naah.

Cpanel isn't included in this offer and will be invoiced if someone orders it with 75% discount, no worries! Also, it's a special one weekend discount action, so after this weekend the action will close. We can handle it

It would be cool if they survive. Support is atm. really fast (around 5 minutes to respond and fix some ordering issues).

Maounique

@gsrdgrdghd said: 64mb RAM and 15GB traffic for 7$/month? Sounds reasonable!

There are so many offers on the market for prices like that. We know it well here, but ppl which didnt hear of LEB/LET actually think that 10 dollars a month for their blog in an 128 ram, 4 gb hdd 10 gb traffic a month is a good deal. For north america western europe 10 dollars is nothing, so, it is worth it for them. M

ErawanArifNugroho

I bought the 1GB with just few euro, so, if anyone in LET want tot est them, why don't we bought their 1GB Ram and see how they went?

ynzheng

Hosted by Serverius Holding B.V.

got one VPSSLIM - BASIC VPS Quarterly

will see how they are going